Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz faulted with only one unavailable disk

2010-10-08 Thread Hans-Christian Otto
Hi Cindy, > I don't think the force import of a degraded pool would cause the pool > to be faulted. In general, the I/O error is caused when ZFS can't access the > underlying devices. In this case, your non-standard devices names > might have caused that message. as I wrote in my first mail, zpo

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz faulted with only one unavailable disk

2010-10-08 Thread Hans-Christian Otto
Hi Cindy, > Can you provide the commands you used to create this pool? I don't have them anymore, no. But they were pretty much like what you wrote below. > Are the pool devices actually files? If so, I don't see how you > have a pool device that starts without a leading slash. I tried > to creat

[zfs-discuss] raidz faulted with only one unavailable disk

2010-10-07 Thread Hans-Christian Otto
Hi, I've been playing around with zfs for a few days now, and now ended up with a faulted raidz (4 disks) with 3 disks still marked as online. Lets start with the output of zpool import: pool: tank-1 id: 15108774693087697468 state: FAULTED status: One or more devices contains corrupted da