Re: [security-discuss] Re: [zfs-discuss] Thoughts on ZFS Secure Delete - without using Crypto

2006-12-20 Thread Gary Winiger
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 03:21 -0800, james hughes wrote: > > This would be mostly a "vanity erase" not really a serious "security > > erase" since it will not over write the remnants of remapped sectors. > > Yup. As usual, your milage will vary depending on your threat model. > > My gut fe

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: PSARC 2006/288 zpool history

2006-05-10 Thread Gary Winiger
> I'd like to let this run. I'd like to see if it makes sense > to audit in addition to build the history. The down side being > an additional required privilege. The zpool command is in the ZFS Storage Management Rights Profile and the zfs command is in the ZFS

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: PSARC 2006/288 zpool history

2006-05-10 Thread Gary Winiger
> >> The Solaris audit facility will record a command execution as soon as > Yes, that's a special case of my reason #3 - (sufficient) auditing may > not be enabled. I'd like to let this run. I'd like to see if it makes sense to audit in addition to build the history. The down