table in my opinion...
>
> I still see VxSF (for those who can afford it) being the defacto choice.
>
--
Fred Zlotnick
Senior Director, Solaris NAS
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x85006/+1 650 786 5006
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Fred Zlotnick
Director, Solaris Data Technology
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x85006/+1 650 786 5006
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as
neither given nor endorsed by it.
----
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Fred
e willing to
let me share your information - shrouded or attributed - in a
summary to this alias at a later date.
Thanks,
Fred Zlotnick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Director, Solaris Data Technology
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http:
This is the Migration Problem: given a dataset on a on-ZFS file system,
what is the safest and easiest way to move it to a ZFS pool. There
are two and a half cases:
1. You need to reuse the existing storage.
1.5 You have some extra storage, but not enough for 2 copies of all
your data.
2. You
Hi Robert,
The fix for 6424554 is being backported to S10 and will be available in
S10U3, later this year.
-- Fred
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
Is someone working on a backport (patch) to S10? Any timeframe?
begin:vcard
fn:Fred Zlotnick
n:Zlotnick;Fred
org:Sun Microsystems, I
