Re: [zfs-discuss] [install-discuss] Installing on alternate hardware

2010-08-03 Thread Emily Grettel
> Subject: Re: [install-discuss] Installing on alternate hardware > > On 3/08/10 10:20 PM, Emily Grettel wrote: > > Thanks for the reply James, > > > > > If it were my system, I'd export the ZFS volumes containing my data, > > > reinstall on the new motherboar

[zfs-discuss] Hard drives for ZFS NAS

2010-05-12 Thread Emily Grettel
Hello, I've decided to replace my WD10EADS and WD10EARS drives as I've checked the SMART values and they've accrued some insanely high numbers for the load/unload counts (40K+ in 120 days on one!). I was leaning towards the Black drives but now I'm a bit worried about the TLER lackingne

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Hard disk buffer at 100%

2010-05-10 Thread Emily Grettel
Hi Eric, > Problem is the OP is mixing client 4k drives with 512b drives. How do you come to that assesment? Here's what I have: Ap_Id Information sata1/1::dsk/c7t1d0Mod: WDC WD10EADS-00L5B1 FRev: 01.01A01 sata1/2::dsk/c7t2d0Mod: WDC

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Hard disk buffer at 100%

2010-05-09 Thread Emily Grettel
Hi Ben, > The drive (c7t2d0)is bad and should be replaced. > The second drive (c7t5d0) is either bad or going bad. Dagnabbit. I'm glad you told me this, but I would have thought that running a scrub would have alerted me to some fault? > and as soon as you drop the bad disks things m

[zfs-discuss] ZFS Hard disk buffer at 100%

2010-05-08 Thread Emily Grettel
100% From: gtirl...@sysdroid.com To: emilygrettelis...@hotmail.com CC: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Emily Grettel wrote: Hi, I've had my RAIDz volume working well on SNV_131 but it has come to my attention that there has been some read issues with the dri

[zfs-discuss] ZFS Hard disk buffer at 100%

2010-05-07 Thread Emily Grettel
Hi, I've had my RAIDz volume working well on SNV_131 but it has come to my attention that there has been some read issues with the drives. Previously I thought this was a CIFS problem but I'm noticing that when transfering files or uncompressing some fairly large 7z (1-2Gb) files (or even s

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS extremely slow performance

2010-01-09 Thread Emily Grettel
issue or SMB again? Cheers, Emily > On Dec 31, 2009, at 11:38 PM, Emily Grettel wrote: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > This is my zpool status -v > > > > pool: tank > > state: ONLINE > > status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error.

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS extremely slow performance

2009-12-31 Thread Emily Grettel
Hello! > This could be a broken disk, or it could be some other > hardware/software/firmware issue. Check the errors on the > device with > iostat -En Heres the output: c7t1d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: WDC WD10EADS-00L Revision

Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost

2009-11-21 Thread Emily Grettel
52 -0700 > From: edmud...@bounceswoosh.org > To: emilygrettelis...@hotmail.com > CC: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost > > On Sat, Nov 21 at 15:44, Emily Grettel wrote: > > > >Thanks Mike, this fixed it. > > > &g

[zfs-discuss] Setting up users on ZFS volumes

2009-11-20 Thread Emily Grettel
I'm wondering if anyone knows of any good guides on setting up users on opensolaris and ZFS. Previously we were using Ext3 with LVM with Samba and everyone had a samba account and /homes would be their home directory. Can something like that (or better) be done in ZFS + CIFS on OpenSolaris

Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost

2009-11-20 Thread Emily Grettel
Thanks Mike, this fixed it. I'll stick with this version and see if the CIFS problems continue. Thanks a lot for everyones assistance. Cheers, Em > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:06:15 -0600 > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost > From: mger...@gmail.com > To: emilygrettelis

Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost

2009-11-20 Thread Emily Grettel
gt; To: emilygrettelis...@hotmail.com > CC: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost > > On Sat, Nov 21 at 11:41, Emily Grettel wrote: > > > > Wow that was mighty quick Tim! > > > > Sorry, I have to reboot the server. I

Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost

2009-11-20 Thread Emily Grettel
; Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:14:06 -0700 > From: edmud...@bounceswoosh.org > To: emilygrettelis...@hotmail.com > CC: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost > > On Sat, Nov 21 at 11:41, Emily Grettel wrote: > > > > Wow that was m

Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost

2009-11-20 Thread Emily Grettel
Aha! that makes perfect sense looking at the logs :-) However there is no ddclient on this box so I'm a bit lost as to whats going on. There are no NT Domains either - its basically a test lab. People just use a standard opensolaris account we've setup (for now!) and upload stuff to the NAS.

Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost

2009-11-20 Thread Emily Grettel
re (they are replaceable right now), would this be safe? Cheers, Em Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:47:17 -0600 Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost From: t...@cook.ms To: emilygrettelis...@hotmail.com CC: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Emily Gret

Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost

2009-11-20 Thread Emily Grettel
with another server (remotely) using Acronis. Thanks, Em Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:30:01 -0600 Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost From: t...@cook.ms To: emilygrettelis...@hotmail.com CC: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Emily Grettel w

[zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost

2009-11-20 Thread Emily Grettel
Hi, I'm just starting out on ZFS and OpenSolaris (2009.06) and I'm having an issue with CIFS shares not working after a while. I have about 30 users, I've updated our NT scripts to mount the share at startup and this works OK. If I leave the server up, after a day the CIFS stop working.