silvering, hence the replacement of c2t53d0 with c1t53d0).
Thanks,
Derek E. Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://delewis.blogspot.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
pool would not be
ideal, just to change the controller the mirrored pooldevs are using. If
ZFS cannot do this without (1) exporting the pool and importing it or (2)
doing a complete resilver of the disk(s), this sounds like a valid RFE for
a more intelligent 'zfs replace' or
id, I have two physical paths, so the drives are already visible
to the system. It's also a mirrored pool, so every pooldev also has an
equivalent mirror pooldev. I shouldn't need to export the entire pool just
to change the controller the mirrored pooldevs are using.
Thanks,
Derek
esilver,
which is very expensive. This is a Solaris 10 11/06 system -- any chance
zpool attach/detach has become more intelligent in Solaris Express?
Perhaps, 'zpool replace' was the right way to go about it?
Thanks,
Derek E. Lewis
[EMAIL PROTE
Really? How odd. Seems to be counter-intuitive with this news:
Moreso,
http://www.opendarwin.org/~bbraun/oshistory.html
http://www.opendarwin.org/~bbraun/webkit.html
http://www.opendarwin.org/~bbraun/osfail.html
Apple is not interested in open source, as they've been merely using it
for a PR
