Quoth Mark Ashley on Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:35:57AM +1100:
> Is it possible to tell ZFS to forget those SE6140 LUNs ever belonged to the
> zpool? I know that ZFS will have probably put some user data on them, but if
> there is a possibility of recovering any of those zvols on the zpool
> it'd rea
Quoth Stuart Anderson on Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0700:
> Running 102 parallel "zfs destroy -r" commands on an X4500 running S10U4 has
> resulted in "No more processes" errors in existing login shells for several
> minutes of time, but then fork() calls started working again. However, none
Quoth Darren Dunham on Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:50:33PM -0700:
> But a traditional filesystem isn't going to write anything without a
> request. ZFS is constantly updating the pool/uberblock status the way
> things currently work. So even if you choose to defer the atime update
> until much longer
Quoth Darren J Moffat on Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:32:02AM +0100:
> Prompted by a recent /. article on atime vs realtime ranting by some
> Linux kernel hackers (Linus included) I went back and looked at the
> mount_ufs(1M) man page because I was sure that OpenSolaris had more than
> just atime,noa
Quoth Ed Ravin on Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:57:52PM -0700:
> My Solaris 10 box is exporting a ZFS filesystem over NFS. I'm
> accessing the data with a NetBSD 3.1 client, which only supports NFS
> 3. Everything works except when I look at the .zfs/snapshot
> directory. The first time I list out the
Quoth Steven Sim on Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:55:37AM +0800:
>Gurus;
>I am exceedingly impressed by the ZFS although it is my humble opinion
>that Sun is not doing enough evangelizing for it.
What else do you think we should be doing?
David
_
My copies of zpool(1M) have three entries for zpool import:
zpool import [-d dir] [-D]
zpool import [-d dir] [-D] [-f] [-o opts] [-R root] pool | id [newpool]
zpool import [-d dir] [-D] [-f] [-a]
Shouldn't the last one be
zpool import [-d dir] [-D] [-f] -a
? That is, if the
Quoth Darren J Moffat on Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:31:59PM +:
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> >I like the idea, I really do, but it will be s expensive because of
> >ZFS' COW model. Not only file removal or truncation will call bleaching,
> >but every single file system modification... Heh, we
Quoth Thomas Garner on Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:41:15PM -0500:
> I currently have a 400GB disk that is full of data on a linux system.
> If I buy 2 more disks and put them into a raid-z'ed zfs under solaris,
> is there a generally accepted way to build an degraded array with the
> 2 disks, copy the
Quoth Darren J Moffat on Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 01:59:16PM +0100:
> Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
> > Regarding "system partitions" (/var, /opt, all mirrored + alternate
> > disk), what would be YOUR recommendations ? ZFS or not ?
>
> /var for now must be UFS since Solaris 10 doesn't not have ZF
Quoth Thomas Maier-Komor on Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:19:11AM -0700:
> after switching over to zfs from ufs for my ~/ at home, I am a little
> bit disturbed by the noise the disks are making. To be more precise,
> I always have thunderbird and firefox running on my desktop and either
> or both seem t
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:33:44AM +0200:
...
> I would like to customise column width to have nicer view of the hierarchy.
> Wouldn't be good to have some sort of configuration file in which I could set
> up the column
> width ?
No. You want zfs to keep the columns align
12 matches
Mail list logo
