Here is the link to download LSIutil, which can be used to upgrade firmware:
http://www.lsi.com/cm/License.do?url=http://www.lsi.com/DistributionSystem/AssetDocument/LSIUtil_1.62.zip&prodName=LSI7104XP-LC&subType=Miscellaneous&locale=EN
And here again is the link to the 1.30 firmware:
http://www
Upgrade the HBA firmware to version 1.30. We had the same problem, but
upgrading solved it for us.
Daniel Bakken
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Joeri Vanthienen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're using the following components with snv134:
> - 1068E HBA (supermicro)
> - 3U SAS / SAT
the destination server is
version 14 (build 111b).
Rsync does not have this problem and performs extremely well. However,
it will not transfer snapshots. Two other send/receives (234GB and
451GB) between the same servers have worked fine without hanging.
Thanks,
Daniel Bak
We have found the problem. The mountpoint property on the sender was at one
time changed from the default, then later changed back to defaults using zfs
set instead of zfs inherit. Therefore, zfs send included these local
"non-default" properties in the stream, even though the local properties are
Here is the info from zstreamdump -v on the sending side:
BEGIN record
hdrtype = 2
features = 0
magic = 2f5bacbac
creation_time = 0
type = 0
flags = 0x0
toguid = 0
fromguid = 0
toname = promise1/arch...@daily.1
nvlist version
The receive side is running build 111b (2009.06), so I'm not sure if your
advice actually applies to my situation.
Daniel Bakken
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Tom Erickson wrote:
> After build 128, locally set properties override received properties, and
> this would be t
-vFd sas
And now I have gzip compression enabled locally:
zfs get compression sas/archive
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
sas/archive compression gzip local
Not pretty, but it works.
Daniel Bakken
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Cindy Swearingen <
cindy.swea
Cindy,
The source server is OpenSolaris build 129 (zpool version 22) and the
destination is stock OpenSolaris 2009.06 (zpool version 14). Both
filesystems are zfs version 3.
Mystified,
Daniel Bakken
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Cindy Swearingen <
cindy.swearin...@oracle.com>
rties,
snapshots, descendent file systems, and clones are preserved." Snapshots are
preserved, but the compression property is not. Any ideas why this doesn't
work as advertised?
Thanks,
Daniel Bakken
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opens
#x27;t get sweetheart discounts, don't work at
billion dollar corporations, or aren't bankrolled by the Federal
Leviathan.
Daniel Bakken
Systems Administrator
Economic Modeling Specialists Inc
1187 Alturas Drive
Moscow, Idaho 83843
___
zfs-d
is (ZFS), and
haven't any experienced problems to date. Their JBOD systems, when
filled with Western Digital RE3 disks, are an extremely reliable,
low-cost, high performance ZFS storage solution.
Daniel Bakken
Systems Administrator
Economic Modeling Specialists Inc
1187 Alt
hich explains Sun's
staggering losses and the Oracle buyout. We can't afford to pay tens
of thousands of dollars extra for bragging rights over IBM, HP, or
Dell shops.
Daniel Bakken
Systems Administrator
Economic Modeling Specialists Inc
Moscow, Idaho
__
I've used the LSI SAS3442E-R with great success in OpenSolaris 2009.06. It
is a non-raid SAS HBA that costs $220 on NewEgg.
Daniel Bakken
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:21 AM, A. Krijgsman wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since I believe there are people in this list having more experience in
13 matches
Mail list logo
