On Apr 7, 2010, at 5:06 PM, Will Murnane wrote:
> This is on b134:
> $ pfexec pkg image-update
> No updates available for this image.
>
> There is a "zfs hold" command available, but checking for holds on the
> snapshot I'm trying to send (I started it again, to see if disabling
> automatic snaps
On Mar 31, 2010, at 7:51 AM, Charles Hedrick wrote:
> We're getting the notorious "cannot destroy ... dataset already exists". I've
> seen a number of reports of this, but none of the reports seem to get any
> response. Fortunately this is a backup system, so I can recreate the pool,
> but it's
On Oct 18, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Sander Smeenk wrote:
I tried to indicate that it's strange that rmdir works on the snapshot
directory while files inside snapshots are immutable.
This, to me, is a bug.
If you have a snapshot named "p...@snap", this:
# rmdir /pool/.zfs/snapshot/snap
is equivale
On Sep 28, 2009, at 6:58 PM, Albert Chin wrote:
Any reason the refreservation and usedbyrefreservation properties are
not sent?
I believe this was CR 6853862, fixed in snv_121.
-Chris
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://
On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Chris Kirby wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
That's useful information indeed. I've filed this CR:
6885860 zfs send shouldn't require support for snapshot holds
Sorry for the trouble, please l
On Sep 25, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a zfs send command failing for some reason...
# uname -a
SunOS 5.11 snv_123 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
# zfs send -R -I archive-1/archive/
x...@rsync-2009-06-01_07:45--2009-06-01_08:50 archive-1/archive/
x...@rsync-2009-09
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:07 AM, Brandon Mercer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:11 AM, wrote:
Hello all, I'm running 2009.06 and I've got a "random" kernel panic
that keeps killing my system under high IO loads. It happens almost
every time I start loading up the writes on at pool. Memory ha
On Mar 27, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
a) that is probably what is wanted most of the time anyway
b) it is easy to pass from userland to kernel - you pass the
rules (after some userland sanity checking first) as is.
But doesn't that also exclude the pos
On Mar 17, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Grant Lowe wrote:
bash-3.00# zfs create -b 8192 -V 44Gb oracle/prd_data/db1
I'm trying to set a mountpoint. But trying to mount it doesn't work.
bash-3.00# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
oracle 44.0G 653G 25.5K /ora
On Jan 28, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Will Murnane wrote:
>
> (on the client workstation)
> wil...@chasca:~$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=bigfile
> dd: closing output file `bigfile': Disk quota exceeded
> wil...@chasca:~$ rm bigfile
> rm: cannot remove `bigfile': Disk quota exceeded
Will,
I filed a CR on th
On Jan 16, 2009, at 4:47 AM, Nick Smith wrote:
>
> When I use the command 'zfs send -v snapshot-name' I expect to see
> as the manpage states, some "verbose information" printed to stderr
> (probably) but I don't see anything on either Solaris 10u6 or
> OpenSolaris 2008.11. I am doing somethi
On Nov 13, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Chris Kirby wrote:
> Oh, right, on pools with version >= SPA_VERSION_REFRESERVATION
> we add a refreservation for zvols instead of a regular reservation.
>
> So a 100G zvol will have a 100G refreservation set at creation
> time.
Just to clarify this
On Nov 13, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> Are you sure that you don't have any refreservations?
Oh, right, on pools with version >= SPA_VERSION_REFRESERVATION
we add a refreservation for zvols instead of a regular reservation.
So a 100G zvol will have a 100G refreservation set at cr
Andy Lubel wrote:
> On May 14, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
>
>> | Think what you are looking for would be a combination of a snapshot
>> | and zfs send/receive, that would give you an archive that you can
>> use
>> | to recreate your zfs filesystems on your zpool at will at later
Kyle McDonald wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I assume that ZFS quotas are enforced even if the current
>>> size and space free is not included in the user visible 'df'.
>>> Is that not true?
>>>
>>> Presumably applications get some unexpected error when the
>>> quota limit is hit since t
Balaji Kutty wrote:
> Chris Kirby wrote:
>
>>Balaji Kutty wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I want to disable extended attributes in my zfs on s10u4. I found out
>>>that the command to do is zfs set xattr=off . But, I do not
>>>see thi
Balaji Kutty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to disable extended attributes in my zfs on s10u4. I found out
> that the command to do is zfs set xattr=off . But, I do not
> see this option in s10u4.
This RFE (6351954) appears to have been integrated into s10u4.
What error message are you seeing when you
Balaji Kutty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to disable extended attributes in my zfs on s10u4. I found out
> that the command to do is zfs set xattr=off . But, I do not
> see this option in s10u4.
Hmm, I thought that had made it back to s10u4, but I guess not.
>
> How can I disable zfs extended attr
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:31:09PM -0600, Chris Kirby wrote:
>
>>>Er, good question! I think the shells would have to support it. A good
>>>question for Roland :)
>>
>>The shells don't actually have to care:
>>
>>
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:13:06PM -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
>
>>Nicolas Williams wrote:
>>
>>>man runat
>>>
>>
>>Oh! Cool!
>>
>>Is that the only way to access those attributes? or just the one that's
>>most likely to work?
>
>
> man fsattr
>
> :)
>
>
>>I can see
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, James F. Hranicky wrote:
>
>
>>and due to the fact that snapshots counted toward ZFS quota, I decided
>
>
> Yes, that does seem to remove a bit of their value for backup purposes. I
> think they're planning to rectify that at some point in the future
Mike Gerdts wrote:
> It appears as though the author has not yet tried out snapshots. The
> fact that space used by a snapshot for the sysadmin's convenience
> counts against the user's quota is the real killer.
Very soon there will be another way to specify quotas (and
reservations) such that t
Jürgen Keil wrote:
I have my /usr filesystem configured as a zfs filesystem,
using a legacy mountpoint. I noticed that the system boots
with atime updates temporarily turned off (and doesn't record
file accesses in the /usr filesystem):
# df -h /usr
Filesystem size used avail cap
23 matches
Mail list logo
