ward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)"
To: "Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC" ,
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:14:59 PM
Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] Question about degraded drive
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> b
this situation I would like to know if I can hold off on physically
replacing the drive. Is there a safe method to test it or put it back into
service and see if it fails again?
Thank you,
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC"
To: zfs-discuss@
2012, at 9:08 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> You don't use replace on mirror vdevs.
>
> 'zpool detach' the failed drive. Then 'zpool attach' the new drive.
>
> On Nov 27, 2012 6:00 PM, "Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC"
> wrote:
>> Hel
Hello,
I have a degraded mirror set and this is has happened a few times (not
always the same drive) over the last two years. In the past I replaced the
drive and and ran zpool replace and all was well. I am wondering, however,
if it is safe to run zpool replace without replacing the drive to s
It's resilvering now - thanks for the help!
- Original Message -
From: "Cindy Swearingen"
To: "Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC"
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 4:26:00 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Replacing failed drive
C
-
From: "Cindy Swearingen"
To: "Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC"
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 3:57:00 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Replacing failed drive
Hi Chris,
Which Solaris release is this?
Depending on the Solaris release, you have a
n use
How do to bring the replaced drive back online and get it into the array? Do I
make the new drive the spare or do I bring the new drive online in the mirror
and return the original spare to spare status? Any advice and/or actual
commands would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you,
Chris D
, but it's a lot more expensive.
Regards,
Chris Dunbar
On Nov 1, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > Hello,
> >
> > I realize this is a perpetual topic, but after re-reading all the
> > messages I had saved on the sub
planning to buy two Intel
X25-E 32 GB drives, but then read something about OCZ Vertex 2 drives and the
benefits of supercapicitors. The server sits in a colo center so the power is
reasonably reliable, but certainly not foolproof.
Thank you,
Chris Dunbar
usion/question. Is it possible to
share the same ZFS file system with multiple ESX hosts via iSCSI? My belief is
that an iSCSI connection is sort of like having a dedicated physical drive and
therefore does not lend itself to sharing between multiple systems. Please set
me straight.
Thank you,
Hello,
More for my own edification than to help Jason (sorry Jason!) I would like to
clarify something. If read performance is paramount, am I correct in thinking
RAIDZ is not the best way to go? Would not the ZFS equivalent of RAID 10
(striped mirror sets) offer better read performance? In thi
Brandon,
Thank you for the explanation. It looks like I will have to share out each file
system. I was trying to keep the number of shares manageable, but it sounds
like that won't work.
Regards,
Chris
On Mar 24, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Brandon High wrote:
> 2010/3/24 Chris Dunbar
> I
e a snapshot of tank/nfs, does it include the data in foo1 and foo2
or are they excluded since they are separate ZFS file systems?
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Chris Dunbar
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensola
ll be doing the same thing. I think
the 6 x 2-way mirror configuration gives me the best mix of performance and
fault tolerance.
Regards,
Chris Dunbar
On Mar 19, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
> Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > After being imme
do have a 13th disk available as a hot spare. Would
it be available for either pool if I went with two? Finally, would I be better
off with raidz2 or something else instead of the striped mirrored sets?
Performance and fault tolerance are my highest priorities.
Tha
same
time we built the server) and plan to replace that tonight. Does that seem like
the correct course of action? Are there any steps I can take beforehand to zero
in on the problem? Any words of encouragement or wisdom?
Regards,
Chris Dunbar
Eart
16 matches
Mail list logo
