Julius Roberts wrote:
I would like to hear if anyone is using ZFS with this card and how you set
it up, and what, if any, issues you've had with that set up.
However I would expect that if you could present 8 raid0 luns to
the host then that should be at least a decent config to start
using for
Toby Thain wrote:
On 10-Feb-09, at 10:36 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
On February 10, 2009 4:41:35 PM -0800 Jeff Bonwick
wrote:
Not if the disk drive just *ignores* barrier and flush-cache commands
and returns success. Some consumer drives really do exactly that.
ouch.
If it were possible to d
All,
I've been following the thread titled 'ZFS: unreliable for professional use'
and I've learned a few things. Put simply, external devices don't behave like
internal ones.
>From JB :
>The good news is that ZFS is getting popular enough on consumer-grade
>hardware. The bad news is that s
Jakov Sosic wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> I'm doing series of tests on ZFS before putting it into production on several
> machines, and I've come to a dead end. I have two disks in mirror (rpool).
> Intentionally, I corrupt data on second disk:
>
> # dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/rdsk/c0d1t0 bs=512 count=
First, I've been very impressed with ZFS performance and notification of
problems. It was because of this early notification that I should have been
able
to salvage an array properly!
Onto the problem I'm hoping you can solve ! :
Running on a 64bit platform with 5, 500GB HDDs in a basic raidz
