+--
| On 2013-02-17 01:17:58, Tim Cook wrote:
|
| While I'm sure many appreciate the offer as I do, I can tell you for me
| personally: never going to happen. Why would I spend all that time and
| energy participating in
+--
| On 2013-02-17 18:40:47, Ian Collins wrote:
|
> One of its main advantages is it has been platform agnostic. We see
> Solaris, Illumos, BSD and more recently ZFS on Linux questions all give the
> same respect.
>
>
+--
| On 2011-11-23 13:43:10, Harry Putnam wrote:
|
| Somehow I touched some rather peculiar file names in ~. Experimenting
| with something I've now forgotten I guess.
|
| Anyway I now have 3 zero length files with name
+--
| On 2011-03-16 12:33:58, Jim Mauro wrote:
|
| With ZFS, Solaris 10 Update 9, is it possible to
| detach configured log devices from a zpool?
|
| I have a zpool with 3 F20 mirrors for the ZIL. They're
| coming up corr
+--
| On 2010-11-23 13:28:38, Tony Schreiner wrote:
|
> am I supposed to do something with c1t3d0 now?
Presumably you want to replace the dead drive with one that works?
zpool offline the dead drive, if it isn't already,
Disclaimer: Solaris 10 U8.
I had an SSD die this morning and am in the process of replacing the 1GB
partition which was part of a log mirror. The SSDs do nothing else.
The resilver has been running for ~30m, and suggests it will finish sometime
before Elvis returns from Andromeda, though perhaps
+--
| On 2010-11-15 11:27:02, Toby Thain wrote:
|
| > Backups are not going to save you from bad memory writing corrupted data to
| > disk.
|
| It is, however, a major motive for using ZFS in the first place.
In this con
+--
| On 2010-11-15 08:48:55, Frank wrote:
|
| I am a newbie on Solaris.
| We recently purchased a Sun Sparc M3000 server. It comes with 2 identical
hard drives. I want to setup a raid 1. After searching on google, I fou
+--
| On 2010-11-15 10:21:06, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
|
| Backups.
|
| Even if you upgrade your hardware to better stuff... with ECC and so on ...
| There is no substitute for backups. Period. If you care about your da
+--
| On 2010-11-08 13:27:09, Peter Taps wrote:
|
| From zfs documentation, it appears that a "vdev" can be built from more
vdevs. That is, a raidz vdev can be built across a bunch of mirrored vdevs, and
a mirror can be
I just had an SSD blow out on me, taking a v10 zpool with it. The pool
currently shows up as UNAVAIL, "missing device".
The system is currently running U9, which has `import -F`, but not `import -m`.
My understanding is the pool would need to be >=19 for that to work regardless.
I have copies of
+--
| On 2010-09-16 18:08:46, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
|
| Best practice in Solaris 10 U8 and older was to use a mirrored ZIL.
|
| With the ability to remove slog devices in Solaris 10 U9, we're
| thinking we may get more ba
12 matches
Mail list logo
