Yup, that's exactly what I did last night...
zoned=off
mountpoint=/some/place
mount
unmount
mountpoint=legacy
zoned=on
Thanks!
On May 20, 2012, at 3:09 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> 2012-05-20 8:18, Anil Jangity wrote:
>> What causes these messages?
>>
>> cannot create sna
What causes these messages?
cannot create snapshot 'zones/rani/ROOT/zbe-2@migration': dataset is busy
There are zones living in zones pool, but none of the zones are running or
mounted.
root@:~# zfs get -r mounted,zoned,mountpoint zones/rani
NAME PROPERTYVALUE
I have a couple of Sun/Oracle x2270 boxes and am planning to get some 2.5"
intel 320 SSD for the rpool.
Do you happen to know what kind of bracket is required to get the 2.5" SSD to
fit into the 3.5" slots?
Thanks
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-disc
Oh, my hunch was right. Yup, I do have an hourly snapshot going. I'll
take it out and see.
Thanks!
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Anil Jangity wrote:
>
>
>> On one of the pools, I started a scrub. It never finishes. At one time,
>> I saw it go up to
On one of the pools, I started a scrub. It never finishes. At one time,
I saw it go up to like 70% and then a little bit later I ran the pool
status, it went back to 5% and started again.
What is going on? Here is the pool layout:
pool: data2
state: ONLINE
scrub: scrub in progress, 35.25% d
Is it possible to give access to the snapshots of a global zone (through
lofs perhaps?) into a zone? I recall that
you can't just delegate a snapshot dataset into a zone yet, but was
wondering if there is some lofs magic I can do?
Thanks
___
zfs-discu
I was using a 5 minute interval.
I did another test with 1 second interval:
data1 41.6G 5.65G 0 0 63.4K 0
data2 58.2G 9.81G 0447 0 2.31M
So, the 63K read bandwidth doesn't show any read operations still. Is
that still rounding?
What exactly is an op
A three-way mirror and three disks in a double parity array are going to get you
the same usable space. They are going to get you the same level of redundancy.
The only difference is that the RAIDZ2 is going to consume a lot more CPU cycles
calculating parity for no good cause.
In this case,
Why is it that the read operations are 0 but the read bandwidth is >0?
What is iostat
[not] accounting for? Is it the metadata reads? (Is it possible to
determine what kind of metadata
reads these are?
I plan to have 3 disks and am debating what I should do with them, if I
should do a
raidz (si
Thanks James/John!
That link specifically mentions "new Solaris 10 release", so I am assuming that
means going from like u4 to Sol 10 u5, and that shouldn't cause a problem when
doing plain patchadd's (w/o live upgrade). If so, then I am fine with those
warnings and can use zfs with zones' path
I have pool called "data".
I have zones configured in that pool. The zonepath is: /data/zone1/fs.
(/data/zone1 itself is not used for anything else, by anyone, and has no other
data.) There are no datasets being delegated to this zone.
I want to create a snapshot that I would want to make avail
11 matches
Mail list logo
