I did not say there is something wrong about published reports. I often read
them. (Who doesn't?) However, there are no trustworthy reports on this topic
yet, since Btrfs is unfinished. Let's see some examples:
(1) http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=zfs_ext4_btrfs&num=1
My littl
Well, a typical conversation about speed and stability usually boils down
to this:
A: I've heard that XYZ is unstable and slow.
B: Are you sure? Have you tested XYZ? What are your benchmark results?
Have you had any issues?
A: No. I *have* *not* *tested* XYZ. I think XYZ is so unstable and slow
t
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Andrej Podzimek
Or Btrfs. It may not be ready for production now, but it could become a
serious alternative to ZFS in one year's time or so. (I have been using
I will much sooner pay for
3. Just stick with b134. Actually, I've managed to compile my way up to b142,
but I'm having trouble getting beyond it - my attempts to install later
versions just result in new boot environments with the old kernel, even with
the latest pkg-gate code in place. Still, even if I get the latest c
ap> 2) there are still bugs that *must* be fixed before Btrfs can
ap> be seriously considered:
ap> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org/msg05130.html
I really don't think that's a show-stopper. He filled the disk with
2KB files. HE FILLED THE DISK WITH 2KB
Ubuntu always likes to be "on the edge" even if btrfs is far from being
'stable' I would not want to run a release that does this. Servers need
stability and reliability. Btrfs is far from this.
Well, it seems to me that this is a well-known and very popular „circle in
proving“:
A: XYZ is far
I ran 'zpool scrub' and will report what happens once it's finished. (It will
take pretty long.)
The scrub finished successfully (with no errors) and 'zpool status -v' doesn't
crash the kernel any more.
Andrej
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
__
Hello,
I got a zfs panic on build 143 (installed with onu) in the following unusual
situation:
1) 'zpool scrub' found a corrupted snapshot on which two BEs were based.
2) I removed the first dependency with 'zfs promote'.
3) I removed the second dependency with 'zfs -pv
Hello,
I have a problem after accessing a zpool containing a boot environment from
another system. When the zpool is accessed (imported, mounted and exported
again) by another system, the device addresses stored in its metadata are
overwritten. Consequently, it is not bootable any more and cau
Hello,
Is it possible to detach a clone from its snapshot (and copy all its data
physically)? I ran into an obscure situation where 'zfs promote' does not help.
Snapshot S has clones C1 and C2, both of which are boot environments. S has a
data error that cannot be corrected. The error affects
10 matches
Mail list logo
