d not
clients with the budget to throw hardware at the problem.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Richard Elling
wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2010, at 8:25 PM, Eric D. Mudama wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25 at 20:21, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Alastair Neil wrote:
> &g
just that
reason, but are stymied by this problem.
Alastair
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Alastair Neil wrote:
>
> I don't think I have seen this addressed in the follow-ups to your
>> me
I don't think I have seen this addressed in the follow-ups to your message.
One issue we have is with deploying large numbers of files systems per pool
- not necessarily large numbers of disk. There are major scaling issues
with the sharing of large numbers of file systems, in my configuration I
Ditto, and also some estimate of when we can see them in opensolaris.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
>
> I've had a case open for a year or so now regarding the inefficiencies of
> having a large number of zfs filesystems, in particular how long it takes
> to share/unshar
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> Alastair Neil wrote:
>
>>However, the user or group quota is applied when a clone or a
>>snapshot is created from a file system that has a user or group quota.
>>
>> "applied to a clone" I u
I am one of the much blessed university users who wishes to provide home
directories and web space to thousands of users and is being bitten by
abysmal scaling behaviour of zfs, the overhead of creating thousands of zfs
files sytems in a pool can takes days to complete. Sharing or unsharing
them c
I'm not sure if this is the correct list for this query, however, I am
trying to create a number of zpools inside a zone. I am running snv_117 and
this is a ipkg banded zone, here is the zone configuration:
a...@vs-idm:~$ zonecfg -z vsnfs-02 export
> create -b
> set zonepath=/rpool/zones/vsnfs-0
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009, Alastair Neil wrote:
>
>>
>> The crux here is the abysmal scaling of zfs. When the script starts it
>> can
>> create a new filesystem every 3 secon
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Alastair Neil wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Richard Elling
> wrote:
>
>> Alastair Neil wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Richard Elling <
>>>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>
> Hello Alastair,
>
> Monday, April 27, 2009, 10:18:50 PM, you wrote:
>
> Seems or did you confirm it with mount or df command?
>
> Do you mount it manually then?
>
>http://milek.blogspot.com
>
This
Yes generally the filesystem gets created just that the mount seems not to
take place.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello Alastair,
>
>
> Monday, April 27, 2009, 7:17:51 PM, you wrote:
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 20
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Alastair Neil wrote:
> A very basic question. I have in recent releases of opensolaris found that
> a script I use to create large number of account home directories has been
> failing because the script attempts to create and modify the directories
&g
A very basic question. I have in recent releases of opensolaris found that
a script I use to create large number of account home directories has been
failing because the script attempts to create and modify the directories
after the zfs create only to find that there is no directory. This is in
s
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Alastair Neil wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Tim Haley wrote:
>
>> Alastair Neil wrote:
>>
>>> x86 snv 108
>>>
>>> I have a pool with around 5300 file systems called home. I can do:
>>&
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Tim Haley wrote:
> Alastair Neil wrote:
>
>> x86 snv 108
>>
>> I have a pool with around 5300 file systems called home. I can do:
>>
>> zfs set sharenfs=on home
>>
>> however
>>
>> zfs set sharenfs=&
x86 snv 108
I have a pool with around 5300 file systems called home. I can do:
zfs set sharenfs=on home
however
zfs set sharenfs="sec=krb5,rw" home
complains:
cannot set property for 'home': 'sharenfs' cannot be set to invalid options
I feel I must be overlooking something elementary.
Th
pool. The script runs correctly initially and
then errors start appearing with increasing frequency, but not
consistently. The underlying devices of the pool are iscsi volumes so they
may not be the fastest pools, however, I have successfully run this script
without error on previous ve
My system is OS 8.11, updated to dev build 105. I have two pools
constructed from iscsi targets with around 5600 file-systems in each.
I was able to enable NFS sharing and CIFS/SMB sharing on both pools,
however, after a reboot the SMB shares comes up but the NFS server
service does not and event
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Roch wrote:
> Alastair Neil writes:
> > I am attempting to create approx 10600 zfs file systems across two
> > pools. The devices underlying the pools are mirrored iscsi volumes
> > shared over a dedicated gigabit Ethernet with jumbo fra
I am attempting to create approx 10600 zfs file systems across two
pools. The devices underlying the pools are mirrored iscsi volumes
shared over a dedicated gigabit Ethernet with jumbo frames enabled
(MTU 9000) from a Linux Openfiler 2.3 system. I have added a couple of
4GByte zvols from the roo
I have been attempting to set up a test server using OS 200811 (rc2)
The system is a 4 Gbyte Dell Optiplex 755, which has dual core 2 duo cpus.
I created four 10 Gbyte files and two 20Gbyte files under /home using dd
from /dev/zero. I then created two zpools; the first I created a stripe of
two o
Thanks very much that's exactly what I needed to hear :)
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Alastair Neil wrote:
>
>> I've been reading about the work using flash SSD devices for ZIL and cache
>> devices. I was wonde
I've been reading about the work using flash SSD devices for ZIL and cache
devices. I was wondering if anyone knows what releases of Opensolaris and
Solaris these features are available on? The performance inporvements are
pretty dramatic.
Alastair
___
23 matches
Mail list logo
