On 13-01-04 02:08 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
All of these IOPS <--> VDI users guidelines are wrong. The problem
is that the variability of
response time is too great for a HDD. The only hope we have of
getting the back-of-the-napkin
calculations to work is to reduce the variability by using a
On Jan 3, 2013, at 8:38 PM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
> Thanks Richard, Happy New Year.
>
> On 13-01-03 09:45 AM, Richard Elling wrote:
>> On Jan 2, 2013, at 8:45 PM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
>>
>>> I am looking at the performance numbers for the Oracle VDI admin guide.
>>>
>>> http://docs.oracle.com/ht
On Jan 4, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>>
>> Illumos is not so good at dealing with huge memory systems but perhaps
>> it is also more stable as well.
>
> Well, I guess that it depends on your environment, but generally I would
> expect S11 to be more stable if only because the sh
>
> Illumos is not so good at dealing with huge memory systems but perhaps
> it is also more stable as well.
Well, I guess that it depends on your environment, but generally I would
expect S11 to be more stable if only because the sheer amount of bugs
reported by paid customers and bug fixes by
If you're dedicating the disk to a single task (data, SLOG, L2ARC) then
absolutely. If you're splitting tasks and wanting to make a drive do two
things, like SLOG and L2ARC, then you have to do this.
Some of the confusion here is between what is a traditional FDISK
partition (p
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 06:57:44PM -, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'd recommend putting a standard Solaris fdisk
> > partition on the drive and creating the two slices under that.
>
> Why? In most cases giving zfs an entire disk is the best option.
> I wouldn't bother with a
> Personally, I'd recommend putting a standard Solaris fdisk
> partition on the drive and creating the two slices under that.
Why? In most cases giving zfs an entire disk is the best option.
I wouldn't bother with any manual partitioning.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
__
On Thu, Jan 3 at 20:38, Geoff Nordli wrote:
On Jan 2, 2013, at 8:45 PM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
I am looking at the performance numbers for the Oracle VDI admin guide.
http://docs.oracle.com/html/E26214_02/performance-storage.html
From my calculations for 200 desktops ru
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 03:21:33PM -0600, Phillip Wagstrom wrote:
> Eugen,
Thanks Phillip and others, most illuminating (pun intended).
> Be aware that p0 corresponds to the entire disk, regardless of how it
> is partitioned with fdisk. The fdisk partitions are 1 - 4. By using p0 for
>
>
> Thanks. Apparently, napp-it web interface did not do what I asked it to do.
> I'll try to remove the cache and the log devices from the pool, and redo it
> from the command line interface.
>
napp-it up to 0.8 does not support slices or partitions
napp-it 0.9 supports partitions an offers pa
10 matches
Mail list logo
