On 2012-12-03 18:23, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2012-12-02 05:42, Jim Klimov wrote:
So... here are some applied questions:
Well, I am ready to reply a few of my own questions now :)
Continuing the desecration of my deceased files' resting grounds...
2) Do I understand correctly that for the offs
On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:56 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> I've heard a claim that ZFS relies too much on RAM caching, but
> implements no sort of priorities (indeed, I've seen no knobs to
> tune those) - so that if the storage box receives many different
> types of IO requests with different "administrati
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:07:17AM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 06:28:17PM -0500, Peter Tripp wrote:
> > HI Eugen,
> >
> > Whether it's compatible entirely depends on the chipset of the SATA
> > controller.
>
> This is what I was trying to find out. I guess I just have to
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:38:07AM -0800, Gary Driggs wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2012, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> > Either way I'll know the hardware support situation soon
> > enough.
>
> Have you tried contacting Sonnet?
No, but I did some digging. It *might* be a Marvell 88SX7042,
which would be then sup
On Dec 4, 2012, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Either way I'll know the hardware support situation soon
> enough.
Have you tried contacting Sonnet?
-Gary
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-di
Thanks for the help Chris!
Cheers,
Fritz
You wrote:
> > original and and rename the new one, or zfs send or ?? Can I do a send and
> > receive into a filesystem with attributes set as I want or does the receive
> > keep the same attributes as well? Thank you.
>
> That will work. Just create th
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 06:28:17PM -0500, Peter Tripp wrote:
> HI Eugen,
>
> Whether it's compatible entirely depends on the chipset of the SATA
> controller.
This is what I was trying to find out. I guess I just have to
test it empirically.
> Basically that card is just a dual port 6gbps PCI
