On 11/22/12 10:15, Ian Collins wrote:
I look after a remote server that has two iSCSI pools. The volumes for
each pool are sparse volumes and a while back the target's storage
became full, causing weird and wonderful corruption issues until they
manges to free some space.
Since then, one pool h
Hi ZFS fellows,
I already seen on the archive of the list some of you doing some GUID
change of a pool's VDEV, to allow a cloned disk to be imported on the
same system as the source.
Can someone explain in detail how to achieve that?
Has already someone invented the wheel so I would not have to r
I look after a remote server that has two iSCSI pools. The volumes for
each pool are sparse volumes and a while back the target's storage
became full, causing weird and wonderful corruption issues until they
manges to free some space.
Since then, one pool has been reasonably OK, but the other
On 2012-11-21 21:55, Ian Collins wrote:
I can't help thinking these drives would be overkill for an ARC device.
All of the expensive controller hardware is geared to boosting random
write IOPs, which somewhat wasted on a write slowly, read often device.
The enhancements would be good for a ZIL, b
On 11/14/12 12:28, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2012-11-13 22:56, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
Trying again:
Intel just released those drives. Any thoughts on how nicely they will
play in a zfs/hardware raid setup?
Seems interesting - fast, assumed reliable and consistent in its IOPS
(according to marketin
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Timothy Coalson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
>> A couple questions: is there a way to make WD20EFRX (2 TByte, 4k
>> sectors) and WD200FYPS (4k internally, reported as 512 Bytes?)
>> work well together on a current OpenIndiana? Wh
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> A couple questions: is there a way to make WD20EFRX (2 TByte, 4k
> sectors) and WD200FYPS (4k internally, reported as 512 Bytes?)
> work well together on a current OpenIndiana? Which parameters
> need I give the zfs pool in regards to alignmen
On 2012-11-21 16:45, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Thanks, this is great to know. The box will be headless, and
run in text-only mode. I have an Intel NIC in there, and don't
intend to use the Realtek port for anything serious.
My laptop based on AMD E2 VISION integrated CPU and Realtek Gigabit
had interm
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 08:31:23AM -0700, Jan Owoc wrote:
> HI Eugen,
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> > Secondly, has anyone managed to run OpenIndiana on an AMD E-350
> > (MSI E350DM-E33)? If it doesn't work, my only options would
> > be all-in-one with ESXi, FreeNAS
HI Eugen,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Secondly, has anyone managed to run OpenIndiana on an AMD E-350
> (MSI E350DM-E33)? If it doesn't work, my only options would
> be all-in-one with ESXi, FreeNAS, or zfs on Linux.
I'm currently running OI 151a7 on an AMD E-350 syste
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov
>
> As for ZIL - even if it is used with the in-pool variant, I don't
> think your setup needs any extra steps to disable it (as Edward likes
> to suggest), and most other setups don
Hi,
after a flaky 8-drive Linux RAID10 just shredded about 2 TByte worth
of my data at home (conveniently just before I could make
a backup) I've decided to both go full redundancy as well as
all zfs at home.
A couple questions: is there a way to make WD20EFRX (2 TByte, 4k
sectors) and WD200FYPS
12 matches
Mail list logo
