On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
wrote:
> I am confused, because I would have expected a 1-to-1 mapping, if you create
> an iscsi target on some system, you would have to specify which LUN it
> connects to. But that is not the case...
Nope
I am confused, because I would have expected a 1-to-1 mapping, if you create an
iscsi target on some system, you would have to specify which LUN it connects
to. But that is not the case...
I read the man pages for sbdadm, stmfadm, itadm, and iscsiadm. I read some
online examples, where you fi
I am confused, because I would have expected a 1-to-1 mapping, if you create an
iscsi target on some system, you would have to specify which LUN it connects
to. But that is not the case...
I read the man pages for sbdadm, stmfadm, itadm, and iscsiadm. I read some
online examples, where you fi
Formerly, if you interrupted a zfs receive, it would leave a clone with a % in
its name, and you could find it via "zdb -d" and then you could destroy the
clone, and then you could destroy the filesystem you had interrupted receiving.
That was considered a bug, and it was fixed, I think by Sun.
