[zfs-discuss] Announging The First Ever ZFS Conference

2012-09-24 Thread Deirdre Straughan
http://zfsday.com/ Brought to you by the same people who organized dtrace.conf in April, 2012, this two-day event will be your opportunity to catch up on the illumos family (including, of course, SmartOS) and Z

Re: [zfs-discuss] Selective zfs list

2012-09-24 Thread Matthew Ahrens
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Bogdan Ćulibrk wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm trying to achieve selective output of "zfs list" command for specific > user to show only delegated sets. Anyone knows how to achieve this? > I've checked "zfs allow" already but it only helps in restricting the user > to

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS stats output - used, compressed, deduped, etc.

2012-09-24 Thread Richard Elling
On Sep 24, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Jason Usher wrote: > Oh, and one other thing ... > > > --- On Fri, 9/21/12, Jason Usher wrote: > >>> It shows the allocated number of bytes used by the >>> filesystem, i.e. >>> after compression. To get the uncompressed size, >> multiply >>> "used" by >>> "compre

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-09-24 Thread Timothy Coalson
I'm not sure how to definitively check physical sector size on solaris/illumos, but on linux, hdparm -I (capital i) or smartctl -i will do it. OpenIndiana's smartctl doesn't output this information yet (and its smartctl doesn't work on SATA disks unless attached via a SAS chip). The issue is comp

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-09-24 Thread LIC mesh
Any ideas? On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:46 AM, LIC mesh wrote: > That's what I thought also, but since both prtvtoc and fdisk -G see the > two disks as the same (and I have not overridden sector size), I am > confused. > * > * > *iostat -xnE:* > c16t5000C5002AA08E4Dd0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 3

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS stats output - used, compressed, deduped, etc.

2012-09-24 Thread Jason Usher
Oh, and one other thing ... --- On Fri, 9/21/12, Jason Usher wrote: > > It shows the allocated number of bytes used by the > > filesystem, i.e. > > after compression. To get the uncompressed size, > multiply > > "used" by > > "compressratio" (so for example if used=65G and > > compressratio=2.

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-09-24 Thread LIC mesh
That's what I thought also, but since both prtvtoc and fdisk -G see the two disks as the same (and I have not overridden sector size), I am confused. * * *iostat -xnE:* c16t5000C5002AA08E4Dd0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 323 Transport Errors: 489 Vendor: ATA Product: ST32000542AS Revision:

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-09-24 Thread Gregg Wonderly
What is the error message you are seeing on the "replace"? This sounds like a slice size/placement problem, but clearly, prtvtoc seems to think that everything is the same. Are you certain that you did prtvtoc on the correct drive, and not one of the active disks by mistake? Gregg Wonderly >

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-09-24 Thread LIC mesh
As does fdisk -G: root@nas:~# fdisk -G /dev/rdsk/c16t5000C5002AA08E4Dd0 * Physical geometry for device /dev/rdsk/c16t5000C5002AA08E4Dd0 * PCYL NCYL ACYL BCYL NHEAD NSECT SECSIZ 608006080000255 252 512 You have new mail in /var/mail/root root@nas:~# fdis

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-09-24 Thread LIC mesh
Yet another weird thing - prtvtoc shows both drives as having the same sector size, etc: root@nas:~# prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c16t5000C5002AA08E4Dd0 * /dev/rdsk/c16t5000C5002AA08E4Dd0 partition map * * Dimensions: * 512 bytes/sector * 3907029168 sectors * 3907029101 accessible sectors * * Flags: *

Re: [zfs-discuss] Selective zfs list

2012-09-24 Thread Jim Klimov
2012-09-24 14:38, Bogdan Ćulibrk wrote: Regarding RFE, I would do that gladly, but quite frankly since shutdown of opensolaris.org I'm little bit lost where to submit it. Much of the open-sourced ZFS development goes under illumos project umbrella (used as kernel for OI you said you're working

Re: [zfs-discuss] Selective zfs list

2012-09-24 Thread Bogdan Ćulibrk
Hello Richard, thanks for reply. On 9/21/12 8:09 PM, Richard Elling wrote: There are several ways, but no builtin way, today. Can you provide a use case for how you want this to work? We might want to create an RFE here :-) -- richard Could you give some pointers on how to do it? If it's