Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread Richard Elling
On Aug 9, 2012, at 4:11 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote: > Sa?o Kiselkov wrote: > >> On 08/09/2012 01:05 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: >>> Sa?o Kiselkov wrote: >>> > To me it seems that the "open-sourced ZFS community" is not open, or > could you > p

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2012-Aug-09 16:05:00 +0530, Jim Klimov wrote: >2012-08-09 13:57, Karl Wagner wrote: >> Firstly, I believe it currently stands at zpool v28. Is this correct? For FreeBSD 8.x and 9.x, yes. FreeBSD-head includes "feature flags" and "com.delphix:async_destroy". >> Will this be updated any time s

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris
> From: Joerg Schilling [mailto:joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de] > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 11:35 AM > > > > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > > > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Schilling > > > > > > Well, why then has there been a discussion

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread Joerg Schilling
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris wrote: > > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Schilling > > > > Well, why then has there been a discussion about a "closed zfs mailing > > list"? > > Is this no longer true? > > Ora

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Schilling > > Well, why then has there been a discussion about a "closed zfs mailing list"? > Is this no longer true? Oracle can do anything internally they want. I would presume they h

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
On 08/09/2012 01:11 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Sa?o Kiselkov wrote: > >> On 08/09/2012 01:05 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: >>> Sa?o Kiselkov wrote: >>> > To me it seems that the "open-sourced ZFS community" is not open, or > could you > point me to their mailing list archives? >

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread Joerg Schilling
Sa?o Kiselkov wrote: > On 08/09/2012 01:05 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Sa?o Kiselkov wrote: > > > >>> To me it seems that the "open-sourced ZFS community" is not open, or > >>> could you > >>> point me to their mailing list archives? > >>> > >>> Jörg > >>> > >> > >> z...@lists.illumos.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
On 08/09/2012 01:05 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Sa?o Kiselkov wrote: > >>> To me it seems that the "open-sourced ZFS community" is not open, or could >>> you >>> point me to their mailing list archives? >>> >>> Jörg >>> >> >> z...@lists.illumos.org > > Well, why then has there been a discussi

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread Joerg Schilling
Sa?o Kiselkov wrote: > > To me it seems that the "open-sourced ZFS community" is not open, or could > > you > > point me to their mailing list archives? > > > > Jörg > > > > z...@lists.illumos.org Well, why then has there been a discussion about a "closed zfs mailing list"? Is this no longer

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Schilling > > Jim Klimov wrote: > > > In the end, the open-sourced ZFS community got no public replies > > from Oracle regarding collaboration or lack thereof, and decided > > to part w

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
On 08/09/2012 12:52 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Jim Klimov wrote: > >> In the end, the open-sourced ZFS community got no public replies >> from Oracle regarding collaboration or lack thereof, and decided >> to part ways and implement things independently from Oracle. >> AFAIK main ZFS developmen

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread Karl Wagner
On 2012-08-09 11:35, Jim Klimov wrote: 2012-08-09 13:57, Karl Wagner wrote: Hi everyone, I have a couple of questions regarding FreeBSD's ZFS support. Firstly, I believe it currently stands at zpool v28. Is this correct? Will this be updated any time soon? Also, looking at the Wikipedia pag

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread Joerg Schilling
Jim Klimov wrote: > In the end, the open-sourced ZFS community got no public replies > from Oracle regarding collaboration or lack thereof, and decided > to part ways and implement things independently from Oracle. > AFAIK main ZFS development converges in illumos-gate, contributed > to by some O

Re: [zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread Jim Klimov
2012-08-09 13:57, Karl Wagner wrote: Hi everyone, I have a couple of questions regarding FreeBSD's ZFS support. Firstly, I believe it currently stands at zpool v28. Is this correct? Will this be updated any time soon? Also, looking at the Wikipedia page, the updates beyond this are: 29 Sol

[zfs-discuss] FreeBSD ZFS

2012-08-09 Thread Karl Wagner
Hi everyone, I have a couple of questions regarding FreeBSD's ZFS support. Firstly, I believe it currently stands at zpool v28. Is this correct? Will this be updated any time soon? Also, looking at the Wikipedia page, the updates beyond this are: 29 Solaris Nevada b148 RAID-Z/mirror