Hi,
I a Solaris 10 Update 10 box with 1 disk which is used for two different
zpool:
root@sct-jordi-02:~# cat /etc/release
Oracle Solaris 10 8/11 s10x_u10wos_17b X86
Copyright (c) 1983, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights
reserved.
>
> I don't think "accurate equations" are applicable in this case.
> You can have estimates like "no more/no less than X" based on,
> basically, level of redundancy and its overhead. ZFS metadata
> overhead can also be smaller or bigger, depending on your data's
> typical block size (fixed for zv
2012-05-03 3:07, Fred Liu wrote:
There is no specific problem to resolve. Just want to get sort of accurate
equation between
the "raw storage size" and the "usable storage size" although the *meta file*
size is trivial.
If you do mass storage budget, this equation is meaningful.
I don't think
>
>What problem are you trying to solve? How would you want referenced or
>userused@... to work?
>
>To be more clear: space shared between a clone and its origin is
>"referenced" by both the clone and the origin, so it is charged to both the
>clone's and origin's userused@... properties. The add
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
>>
>>The size accounted for by the userused@ and groupused@ properties is the
>>"referenced" space, which is used as the basis for many other space
>>accounting values in ZFS (e.g. "du" / "ls -s" / stat(2), and the zfs
>>accounting
>>properties "ref
>IIRC, the senior product architects and perhaps some engineers have
>left Oracle. A better question for your Oracle rep is whether there is a
>plan to anything other than sustaining engineering for the product.
I see.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss
.
>
>If you want to know Oracle's roadmap for SAM-QFS then I recommend
>contacting your Oracle account rep rather than asking on a ZFS discussion list.
>You won't get SAM-QFS or Oracle roadmap answers from this alias.
>
My original purpose is to ask if there is an effort to integrate open-sourced
>
>The size accounted for by the userused@ and groupused@ properties is the
>"referenced" space, which is used as the basis for many other space
>accounting values in ZFS (e.g. "du" / "ls -s" / stat(2), and the zfs accounting
>properties "referenced", "refquota", "refreservation", "refcompressratio
On May 2, 2012, at 2:40 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
>>
>> Still a fully supported product from Oracle:
>>
>> http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/storage/storage-
>> software/qfs-software/overview/index.html
>>
>
> Yeah. But it seems no more updates since sun acquisition.
> Don't know Orac
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> If you want to know Oracle's roadmap for SAM-QFS then I recommend contacting
> your Oracle account rep rather than asking on a ZFS discussion list. You
> won't get SAM-QFS or Oracle roadmap answers from this alias.
Or you could try asking
On 05/02/12 10:40, Fred Liu wrote:
Still a fully supported product from Oracle:
http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/storage/storage-
software/qfs-software/overview/index.html
Yeah. But it seems no more updates since sun acquisition.
Don't know Oracle's roadmap in aspect of data-
>The time is the creation time of the snapshots.
Yes. That is true.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
> Still a fully supported product from Oracle:
>
> http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/storage/storage-
> software/qfs-software/overview/index.html
>
Yeah. But it seems no more updates since sun acquisition.
Don't know Oracle's roadmap in aspect of data-tying.
Thanks.
Fred
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
