On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
On Thu 2011-12-22 (10:09), Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
One of your disks failed to return a sector. Due to redundancy, the
original data was recreated from the remaining disks. This is normal
good behavior (other than the disk failing to read the sector).
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Myers Carpenter wrote:
>> So the lesson here: Don't be a dumbass like me. Setup up nagios or some
>> other system to alert you when a pool has become degraded. ZFS works very
>> well with one drive out of the
On Thu 2011-12-22 (09:13), Richard Elling wrote:
> Be happy. Dance a jig. Buy a lottery ticket.
> Notice: scrub repaired 85.5K in 1h21m with 0 errors on Mon Dec 19 06:24:25
> 2011
> ZFS found corruption and fixed it.
lol, will do next time.
> oops... tempting the fates?
> Transient errors do occ
On Thu 2011-12-22 (10:09), Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> One of your disks failed to return a sector. Due to redundancy, the
> original data was recreated from the remaining disks. This is normal
> good behavior (other than the disk failing to read the sector).
So those checksum counts were histori
On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
> Hi guys, after a scrub my raidz array status showed:
>
> # zpool status
> pool: pool
> state: ONLINE
> status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
>attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are u
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Myers Carpenter wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Myers Carpenter wrote:
>
>> I would like to pick the brains of the ZFS experts on this list: What
>> would you do next to try and recover this zfs pool?
>>
>
> I hate running across threads that ask a
As I posted in other messages I have had two drives fail in a raidz1 set.
One drive failed a month before the second and I didn't notice before the
second drive failed.
I would like to send this second drive to a data recovery company. I've
talked to Seagate (which is also the manufacture of the
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
I assume the checksum counts are current and irreconcilable. (Why does
the scan say 'repaired with 0 errors' then?).
One of your disks failed to return a sector. Due to redundancy, the
original data was recreated from the remaining disks. This is n
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Myers Carpenter wrote:
> I would like to pick the brains of the ZFS experts on this list: What
> would you do next to try and recover this zfs pool?
>
I hate running across threads that ask a question and the person that asked
them never comes back to say what the
