tip below…
On Nov 13, 2011, at 3:24 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:08:04AM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 12, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:15:31AM -0500, David Magda wrote:
On Nov 12, 2011, at 00:55, Richard
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Liu
>
> Why not give some tolerance to Btrfs? You can kindly drop an email to
> its mail list for any issue you are not satisfied with.
> Satirize or lampoon does not make sense to any ope
On 11/13/2011 05:18 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>> LOL. Well, for what it's worth, there are three common pronunciations for
>> btrfs. Butterfs, Betterfs, and B-Tree FS (because it's based on b-trees.)
>> Check wikipedia. (This isn't really true, but I like to joke, after
>> saying something like t
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:08:04AM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
>
> On Nov 12, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:15:31AM -0500, David Magda wrote:
> >> On Nov 12, 2011, at 00:55, Richard Elling wrote:
> >>
> >>> Better than ?
> >>> If the disks advertise 5
> LOL. Well, for what it's worth, there are three common pronunciations for
> btrfs. Butterfs, Betterfs, and B-Tree FS (because it's based on b-trees.)
> Check wikipedia. (This isn't really true, but I like to joke, after
> saying something like that, I wrote the wikipedia page just now.) ;-)
