>
> ... so when will zfs-related improvement make it to solaris-
> derivatives :D ?
>
I am also very curious about Oracle's policy about source code. ;-)
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailm
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
>
... so when will zfs-related improvement make it to solaris-derivatives :D ?
--
FAN
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
2011/11/10 Jeff Savit
> **
> Hi darkblue, comments in-line
>
>
> On 11/09/2011 06:11 PM, darkblue wrote:
>
> hi, all
> I am a newbie on ZFS, recently, my company is planning to build a
> entry-level enterpirse storage server.
> here is the hardware list:
>
> 1 * XEON 5606
> 1 * supermirco X8DT3-L
Hi darkblue, comments in-line
On 11/09/2011 06:11 PM, darkblue wrote:
hi, all
I am a newbie on ZFS, recently, my company is planning to build a
entry-level enterpirse storage server.
here is the hardware list:
1 * XEON 5606
1 * supermirco X8DT3-LN4F
6 * 4G RECC RAM
22 * WD RE3 1T harddisk
4 *
Some laptops have pc card and expresscard slots, and you can get an adapter for
sd card, so you could set up your os non mirrored and just set up home on a
pair of sd cards. Something like
http://www.amazon.com/Sandisk-SDAD109A11-Digital-Card-Express/dp/B000W3QLLW
I've done this in the past, var
hi, all
I am a newbie on ZFS, recently, my company is planning to build a
entry-level enterpirse storage server.
here is the hardware list:
1 * XEON 5606
1 * supermirco X8DT3-LN4F
6 * 4G RECC RAM
22 * WD RE3 1T harddisk
4 * intel 320 (160G) SSD
1 * supermicro 846E1-900B chassis
this storage is go
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Wed, November 9, 2011 10:35, Tomas Forsman wrote:
> Too bad NFS is resilient against servers coming and going..
NFSv4 is statefull, so server reboots are more noticeable. (This has
pluses and minuses.)
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opens
On 08 November, 2011 - Edward Ned Harvey sent me these 2,9K bytes:
> > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Evaldas Auryla
> >
> > I'm trying to evaluate what are the risks of running NFS share of zfs
> > dataset with sync=disabl
On 11/9/2011 8:05 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ding Honghui
But now, as show below, the first 2 raidz1 vdev usage is about 78% and the
last 2 raidz1 vdev usage is about 93%.
In this case, when y
On 11/ 9/11 03:11 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Evaldas Auryla [mailto:evaldas.aur...@edqm.eu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 8:55 AM
I was thinking about STEC ZeusRAM, but unfortunately it's SAS only
device, and it won't make into X4540 (SATA ports only), so another
option could be ST
> From: Evaldas Auryla [mailto:evaldas.aur...@edqm.eu]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 8:55 AM
>
> I was thinking about STEC ZeusRAM, but unfortunately it's SAS only
> device, and it won't make into X4540 (SATA ports only), so another
> option could be STEC MACH16iops (50GB SLC SATA SSD).
Pe
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ding Honghui
>
> But now, as show below, the first 2 raidz1 vdev usage is about 78% and the
> last 2 raidz1 vdev usage is about 93%.
In this case, when you write, it should be writing to the f
On 11/ 9/11 01:42 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
I know a lot of people will say "don't do it," but that's only partial
truth. The real truth is:
At all times, if there's a server crash, ZFS will come back along at next
boot or mount, and the filesystem will be in a consistent state, that was
in
14 matches
Mail list logo
