On 10/28/11 11:21, Mark Wolek wrote:
Having
the log disk slowed it down a lot in your tests (when it wasn’t a SSD),
30MB/s vs 7. Is this is also a 100% write / 100% sequential workload?
Forcing sync?
100% synchronous write. Writes are random but ZFS will write them
sequent
Having the log disk slowed it down a lot in your tests (when it wasn't a SSD),
30MB/s vs 7. Is this is also a 100% write / 100% sequential workload? Forcing
sync?
It's gotten to the point where I can buy a 120G SSD for less or the same price
as a 146G SAS disk...Sure the MLC drives have limit
On 10/28/11 00:54, Neil Perrin wrote:
On 10/28/11 00:04, Mark Wolek wrote:
Still kicking around this idea and didn’t see
it
addressed in any of the threads before the forum closed.
If one made an all ssd pool, would a log/cache
drive just slow you d
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Mark Wolek
>
> Still kicking around this idea and didnt see it addressed in any of the
threads
> before the forum closed.
>
> If one made an all ssd pool, would a log/cache drive just slow yo
