> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Toby Thain
>
> Hmm, of course the *latency* of Ethernet has always been much less, but
> I did not see it reaching the *throughput* of a single direct attached
> disk until gigabit.
Nobody run
2011-10-16 4:14, Tim Cook wrote:
Quite frankly your choice in blade chassis was a horrible design
decision. From your description of its limitations it should never be
the building block for a vmware cluster in the first place. I would
start by rethinking that decision instead of trying to po
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> Thanks to all that replied. I hope we may continue the discussion,
> but I'm afraid the overall verdict so far is disapproval of the idea.
> It is my understanding that those active in discussion considered
> it either too limited (in applicati
Thanks to all that replied. I hope we may continue the discussion,
but I'm afraid the overall verdict so far is disapproval of the idea.
It is my understanding that those active in discussion considered
it either too limited (in application - for VMs, or for hardware cfg),
or too difficult to impl
On 15/10/11 2:43 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011, at 6:14 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Tim Cook
In my example - probably not a completely clustered FS.
A clustered ZFS pool with datas
On Oct 15, 2011, at 6:14 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
>> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Tim Cook
>>
>> In my example - probably not a completely clustered FS.
>> A clustered ZFS pool with datasets individually owned by
>> sp
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, John D Groenveld wrote:
I'm baffled why zpool import is unable to find the pool on the
drive, but the drive is definitely functional.
What type of controller is this drive attached to? I have heard that
some popular LSI controllers just don't work for large drives.
Bob
On Oct 14, 2011, at 7:02 PM, John D Groenveld wrote:
> As a sanity check, I connected the drive to a Windows 7 installation.
> I was able to partition, create an NTFS volume on it, eject and
> remount it.
>
> I also tried creating the zpool on my Solaris 10 system, exporting
> and trying to impor
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Tim Cook
>
> In my example - probably not a completely clustered FS.
> A clustered ZFS pool with datasets individually owned by
> specific nodes at any given time would suffice for such
> VM fa
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov
>
> The idea is you would dedicate one of the servers in the chassis to be a
> Solaris system, which then presents NFS out to the rest of the hosts.
Actually, I looked into a conf
10 matches
Mail list logo
