On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
wrote:
>> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
>> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ian Collins
>>
>> > Got a quick question: what are the latest zpool and zfs versions
>> > supported in Solaris 10 Update 10?
>> >
>>
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ian Collins
>
> > Got a quick question: what are the latest zpool and zfs versions
> > supported in Solaris 10 Update 10?
> >
> In update 10: pool version 29, ZFS version 5.
I don't know what
On 09/30/11 11:59 AM, Rich Teer wrote:
Hi all,
Got a quick question: what are the latest zpool and zfs versions
supported in Solaris 10 Update 10?
In update 10: pool version 29, ZFS version 5.
--
Ian.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opens
Hi all,
Got a quick question: what are the latest zpool and zfs versions
supported in Solaris 10 Update 10?
TIA,
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.op
On 09/30/11 08:03 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Ian Collins wrote:
Slowing down replication is not a good move!
Do you prefer pool corruption? ;-)
Probably they fixed a dire bug and this is the cost of the fix.
Could be. I think I'll raise a support case to find out why.
On 09/30/11 05:14 AM, erik wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:13:56 +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
I have an application that iterates through snapshots sending them to
a remote host. With a Solaris 10 receiver, empty snapshots are received
in under a second, but with a Solaris 11 Express receiver,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Garrett D'Amore
wrote:
>
>
> I think he means, resilver faster.
>
> SSDs can be driven harder, and have more IOPs so we can hit them harder
> with less impact on the overall performance. The reason we throttle at all
> is to avoid saturating the bandwidth of the
On Sep 28, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
>>
>> Also, the default settings for the resilver throttle are set for HDDs. For
> SSDs,
>> it is a
>> good idea to change the throttle to be more aggressive.
>
> You mean...
> Be mor
I have an application that iterates through snapshots sending them to
a remote host. With a Solaris 10 receiver, empty snapshots are received
in under a second, but with a Solaris 11 Express receiver, empty
snapshots are received in 2 to three seconds. This is becoming a real
nuisance where
