On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 01:34:09PM -0700, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Brandon High wrote:
> >
> > The 20GB 311 only costs ~ $100 though. The 100GB Intel 710 costs ~ $650.
> >
> > The 311 is a good choice for home or budget users, and it seems that
> > the 710 is much bigger than i
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Brandon High wrote:
The 20GB 311 only costs ~ $100 though. The 100GB Intel 710 costs ~ $650.
The 311 is a good choice for home or budget users, and it seems that
the 710 is much bigger than it needs to be for slog devices.
Much too big is a good thing if it results in muc
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 01:21:26PM -0700, Brandon High wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > It seems to perform similarly to the X-25E as well (3300 IOPS for
> > random writes). Perhaps the drive can be overprovisioned as well?
> >
> > My impression was that Intel
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> It seems to perform similarly to the X-25E as well (3300 IOPS for
> random writes). Perhaps the drive can be overprovisioned as well?
>
> My impression was that Intel was classifying the 3xx series as
> non-Enterprise however. Even with t
Hi,
Haven't yet ever needed to deal with such scenario (and hopefully will ever
not),
but this is what I'd try:
-Connect the disks back to Linux boxen.
-(zpool import the disks in case previous import DID succeed on Linux)
-Try to do # zpool export
-If it fails try to do # export -f
Let's hop
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:46:42PM -0700, Brandon High wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Markus Kovero
> wrote:
> > Hi, I was wondering do you guys have any recommendations as replacement for
> > Intel X25-E as it is being EOL’d? Mainly as for log device.
>
> The Intel 311 seems like a
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> Looks like another positive for these drives over the "competition".
> The same appears to be the case for the 5k3000's as well (page 96 in
> that document).
Be careful with the smaller 5k3000 drives. The 1TB and 2TB drives are
not manufact
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Markus Kovero wrote:
> Hi, I was wondering do you guys have any recommendations as replacement for
> Intel X25-E as it is being EOL’d? Mainly as for log device.
The Intel 311 seems like a good fit. It's a 20gb SLC device intended
to act as a cache device with the
On Wed, Sep 21 at 10:32, Markus Kovero wrote:
I'd say price range around same than X25-E was, main priorities
being predictable latency and performance. Also write wear shouldn't
get an issue when writing 150MB/s 24/7 365.
At 150MB/s continuously, you're writing 5PB/year (assuming a write
ampli
Hi all,
once I made a mistake and tried to import a zpool on Linux. Now I'm
having the following problem under Solaris 11 Express:
root@blondie:~# zdb -l /dev/dsk/c3t1d0s0
--
LABEL 0
--
timestamp: 1316706103 UTC:
Raul,
> I must configure a small file server. It only has two disk drives,
and they are (forcibly) destined to be used in a mirrored, hot-spare
configuration.
2 disks and mirrored *and* a hotspare ...?? Imho you need 3 disks to do
this setup.
I just wanted to make sure you have your idea's
11 matches
Mail list logo
