Re: [zfs-discuss] Saving data across install

2011-08-02 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >> After my install completes on the smaller mirror, how do I access the 500G >> mirror where I saved my data? If I simply create a tank mirror using those >> drives will it recognize there's data there and make it accessible? Or will >> it d

Re: [zfs-discuss] Saving data across install

2011-08-02 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Nomen Nescio wrote: > I installed a Solaris 10 development box on a 500G root mirror and later I > received some smaller drives. I learned from this list its better to have > the root mirror on the smaller small drives and then create another mirror > on the origina

[zfs-discuss] Saving data across install

2011-08-02 Thread Nomen Nescio
I installed a Solaris 10 development box on a 500G root mirror and later I received some smaller drives. I learned from this list its better to have the root mirror on the smaller small drives and then create another mirror on the original 500G drives so I copied everything that was on the small dr

Re: [zfs-discuss] Wrong rpool used after reinstall!

2011-08-02 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote: > > Hi Roy, things got alot worse since my first email. I don't know what > happened but I can't import the old pool at all. It shows no errors but when > I import it I get a kernel panic from assertion failed: zvol_get_stats(os,

Re: [zfs-discuss] Wrong rpool used after reinstall!

2011-08-02 Thread Anonymous Remailer (austria)
Hi Roy, things got alot worse since my first email. I don't know what happened but I can't import the old pool at all. It shows no errors but when I import it I get a kernel panic from assertion failed: zvol_get_stats(os, nv) which looks like is fixed by patch 6801926 which is applied in Solaris 1

Re: [zfs-discuss] Wrong rpool used after reinstall!

2011-08-02 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> I am having a problem after a new install of Solaris 10. The installed > rpool > works fine when I have only those disks connected. When I connect > disks from > an rpool I created during a previous installation, my newly installed > rpool > is ignored even though the BIOS (x86) is set to boot on

[zfs-discuss] Wrong rpool used after reinstall!

2011-08-02 Thread Anonymous Remailer (austria)
I am having a problem after a new install of Solaris 10. The installed rpool works fine when I have only those disks connected. When I connect disks from an rpool I created during a previous installation, my newly installed rpool is ignored even though the BIOS (x86) is set to boot only from the n

Re: [zfs-discuss] swap weirdness

2011-08-02 Thread Mister Anonyme
# echo "::memstat" | mdb -k Page SummaryPagesMB %Tot Kernel3258470 25456 40% Anon 4427859 34592 54% Exec and libs 215008

Re: [zfs-discuss] swap weirdness

2011-08-02 Thread Max Bruning
What does echo "::memstat" | mdb -k show? max On Aug 2, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Mister Anonyme wrote: > > Hi, > > We have a host, Solaris 10 10/08 s10s_u6wos_07b on SPARC. > > SWAP is on ZFS. > > We allocated two swap devices of 64G each, for a total of around 130G. > > Over the time, swap spa

[zfs-discuss] swap weirdness

2011-08-02 Thread Mister Anonyme
Hi, We have a host, Solaris 10 10/08 s10s_u6wos_07b on SPARC. SWAP is on ZFS. We allocated two swap devices of 64G each, for a total of around 130G. Over the time, swap space usage is increasing until 96% of used: # zpool list NAMESIZE USEDAVAILCAP HEALTH

Re: [zfs-discuss] [illumos-Developer] revisiting aclmode options

2011-08-02 Thread Gordon Ross
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote: > On 7/19/2011 7:10 PM, Gordon Ross wrote: > >> The idea:  A new "aclmode" setting called "discard", meaning that >> the users don't care at all about the traditional mode bits.  A >> dataset with aclmode=discard would have the chmod system ca