Now that illumos has restored the aclmode option to zfs, I would like to
revisit the topic of potentially expanding the suite of available modes.
Some of you no doubt recall a fairly lengthy (and sometimes heated ;) )
discussion of this topic on the zfs-discuss mailing list a bit over a
year ag
Is there a way to tweak the HPA (Host Protected Area) on an Intel 320
SSD using native Solaris commands?
In this case, we'd like to shrink the usable space so as to improve
performance per recommendation in "Intel Solid-State Drive 320 Series
in Server Storage Applications" section 4.1.
hdparm on
If using two mirrors, you'll end up with a badly balanced pool. As it was, and
possibly is, this will lead to a performance penalty when one VDEV is full (the
300GB VDEV). This write performance has reportedly been fixed in Illumos, but I
don't know about S11ex. For OpenIndiana/Nexenta, the fix
2011/7/15 Eugen Leitl :
> Speaking of which, is there a point in using an eSATA flash stick?
> If yes, which?
It depends on the drive off course, you'll have to look up benchmark
results - but there are eSata sticks out there that are more or less
built to Perform (as opposed to providing cheap st
Hi,
Ok, I've done this with success on NexentaStor 3.0.5, using zpool
version 26. I know the aclmode was removed at some point after this, but
then put back in later. (Search the list for details.)
I've got the acl's below set on the top level directory. I put my users
requirering access in
Cindy,
I gave your suggestion a try. I did the zpool clear and then did another zpool
scrub and all is happy now. Thank you for your help.
David
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
ht
On 07/18/11 02:29 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Edward Ned Harvey
[mailto:opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com]
It says zpool version 31 and zfs version 5. Can anybody please confirm or
deny that this is the absolute latest version available to the public in
any
way?
Afte
> From: Edward Ned Harvey
> [mailto:opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com]
>
> It says zpool version 31 and zfs version 5. Can anybody please confirm or
> deny that this is the absolute latest version available to the public in
any
> way?
After applying all updates, it's still zpool
> From: Edward Ned Harvey
> [mailto:opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com]
>
> Intuitive. ;-)
> Thank you.
Kidding aside, for anyone finding this thread at a later time, here's the
answer. It sounds unnecessarily complex at first, but then I went through
it ... Only took like a mi
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Brandon High wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
> wrote:
>> Actually, you can't do that. You can't make a vdev from other vdev's, and
>> when it comes to striping and mirroring your only choice is to do it the
>> right way.
>>
>> If yo
Hi!
But in 28 version of zfs there is no aclmode option at all (i use oi_148).
Also tried set this options to passthrough in oi_151 which has aclmode, but
this not working for me.
>From Windows (cifs) - no problem, all acl's inherited correctly.
But from Linux (nfs) - acl user names inherited corr
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Tiernan OToole wrote:
> Ok, so, taking 2 300Gb disks, and 2 500Gb disks, and creating an 800Gb
> mirrored striped thing is sounding like a bad idea... what about just
> creating a pool of all disks, without using mirrors? I seen something called
> "copies", which i
Ok, so, taking 2 300Gb disks, and 2 500Gb disks, and creating an 800Gb
mirrored striped thing is sounding like a bad idea... what about just
creating a pool of all disks, without using mirrors? I seen something called
"copies", which if i am reading correctly, will make sure a number of copies
of a
13 matches
Mail list logo
