I have a zpool that shows the following from a zpool status -v
brsnnfs0104 [/var/spool/cron/scripts]# zpool status -v ABC0101
pool:ABC0101
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
corruption. Applications may be affected.
action: Restore the
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 08:03:25AM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
> Yes. I've been looking at what the value of zfs_vdev_max_pending should be.
> The old value was 35 (a guess, but a really bad guess) and the new value is
> 10 (another guess, but a better guess). I observe that data from a fast,
>
For SSD we have code in illumos that disables disksort. Ultimately, we believe
that the cost of disksort is in the noise for performance.
-- Garrett D'Amore
On Jun 20, 2011, at 8:38 AM, "Andrew Gabriel" wrote:
> Richard Elling wrote:
>> On Jun 19, 2011, at 6:04 AM, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
>>
Richard Elling wrote:
On Jun 19, 2011, at 6:04 AM, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
Actually, all of the data I've gathered recently shows that the number of IOPS
does not significantly increase for HDDs running random workloads. However the
response time does :-( My data i
On Jun 15, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Has there been any change to the server hardware with respect to number of
> drives since ZFS has come out? Many of the servers around still have an even
> number of drives (2, 4) etc. and it seems far from optimal from a ZFS
> standpoint. All you
On Jun 20, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Gary Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 08:03:25AM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
>> On Jun 19, 2011, at 6:28 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 7:47 PM
Actually, all
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 08:03:25AM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2011, at 6:28 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> >> From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 7:47 PM
> >>
> >> Actually, all of the data I've gathered recently shows that the n
> From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 11:03 AM
>
> > I was planning, in the near
> > future, to go run iozone on some system with, and without the disk cache
> > enabled according to format -e. If my hypothesis is right, it shouldn't
> > significan
Thank you very much Jim for your suggestions.
Trying any kind of import (including importing Read-Only) on SX11 will lead,
everytime, a system panic with following error:
panic[cpu12]/thread=ff02de5e20c0: assertion failed: zap_count(os, object,
&count) == 0, file: ../../common/fs/zfs/ddt_z
Hello,
I have a ZFS raid1 from 2 drives to 1TB .
Recently, my system OS: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE has crashed, with kernel panic:
panic: solaris assert: ss->ss_end >= end (0x6a80753600 >= 0x6a80753800),
file:
/usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/
10 matches
Mail list logo
