>On May 9, 2010 at 5:29PM, Richard Elling wrote:
>>On May 9, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Chris Forgeron wrote:
>>[..]
>> Q1 - Doesn't this behavior mean that the L2ARC can never get data objects if
>> the ARC doesn't hold them?
>
>Yes.
>
>> Is setting primary to metadata and secondary to all an impossible
> The scrub I/O has lower priority than other I/O.
>
> In later ZFS releases, scrub I/O is also throttled. When the throttle
> kicks in, the scrub can drop to 5-10 IOPS. This shouldn't be much of
> an issue, scrubs do not need to be, and are not intended to be, run
> very often -- perhaps once a qu
On May 13, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Donald Stahl wrote:
> Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate
> of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the
> MB/s range during a scrub).
>
The scrub I/O has lower priority than other I/O.
In later ZFS release
On 05/14/11 01:08 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Donald Stahl
Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate
of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Donald Stahl
>
> Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate
> of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the
> MB/s range during a scrub).
Wait
