Re: [zfs-discuss] bootfs ID on zfs root

2011-05-11 Thread Ketan
Hello Jim, Thanks for the reply following is my o/p before setting bootfs parameter # zpool get all rpool NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE rpool size 68G - rpool capacity 5%- rpool altroot-

Re: [zfs-discuss] Backup complete rpool structure and data to tape

2011-05-11 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2011-May-12 00:20:28 +0800, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >Backup/restore of bootable rpool to tape with a 3rd party application like >legato etc is kind of difficult. Because if you need to do a bare metal >restore, how are you going to do it? This is a generic problem, not limited to ZFS. The

Re: [zfs-discuss] Modify stmf_sbd_lu properties

2011-05-11 Thread Don
It turns out this was actually as simple as: stmfadm create-lu -p guid=XXX.. I kept looking at modify-lu to change this and never thought to check the create-lu options. Thanks to Evaldas for the suggestion. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

Re: [zfs-discuss] bootfs ID on zfs root

2011-05-11 Thread Jim Klimov
Hello again. As I kind of explained earlier, and as your screenshots display, your actual root filesystem dataset is named "rpool/ROOT/zfsBE_patched". However either the boot loader (eeprom parameters on SPARC) or much more likely the "rpool" ZFS-pool level attribute "bootfs" contains a differe

Re: [zfs-discuss] bootfs ID on zfs root

2011-05-11 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Hi Ketan, What steps lead up to this problem? I believe the boot failure messages below are related to a mismatch between the pool version and the installed OS version. If you're using the JumpStart installation method, then the root pool is re-created each time, I believe. Does it also instal

Re: [zfs-discuss] bootfs ID on zfs root

2011-05-11 Thread Ketan
So y my system is not coming up .. i jumpstarted the system again ... but it panics like earlier .. so how should i recover it .. and get it up ? System was booted from network into single user mode and then rpool imported and following is the listing # zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREE

Re: [zfs-discuss] Backup complete rpool structure and data to tape

2011-05-11 Thread Glenn Lagasse
* Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com) wrote: > > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Arjun YK > > > > Trying to understand how to backup mirrored zfs boot pool 'rpool' to tape, > > and restore i

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS backup and restore

2011-05-11 Thread Richard Elling
On May 10, 2011, at 11:21 PM, Naveen surisetty wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the response, Here is my problem. > > I have a zfs stream back up took on zfs version 15, currently i have upgraded > my OS, so new zfs version is 22. Restore process went well from old stream > backup to new zfs pool.

Re: [zfs-discuss] Backup complete rpool structure and data to tape

2011-05-11 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Arjun YK > > Trying to understand how to backup mirrored zfs boot pool 'rpool' to tape, > and restore it backĀ if in case the disks are lost. > Backup would be done with an enterprise tool like

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS backup and restore

2011-05-11 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Naveen surisetty > > I have a zfs stream back up took on zfs version 15, currently i have upgraded > my OS, so new zfs version is 22. Restore process went well from old stream > backup to new z

[zfs-discuss] Intel Z68 chipset and SSD 311 ("Larson Creek")

2011-05-11 Thread David Magda
The press embargo on Intel Z68 chipset has been lifted and so there's a bunch of press on it. One feature called Smart Response Technology (SRT) will sound familiar to users of ZFS: > Intel's SRT functions like an actual cache. Rather than caching individual > files, Intel focuses on frequently

Re: [zfs-discuss] Performance problem suggestions?

2011-05-11 Thread Don
> It sent a series of blocks to write from the queue, newer disks wrote them > and stay > dormant, while older disks seek around to fit that piece of data... When old > disks > complete the writes, ZFS batches them a new set of tasks. The thing is- as far as I know the OS doesn't ask the disk to

Re: [zfs-discuss] Modify stmf_sbd_lu properties

2011-05-11 Thread Evaldas Auryla
On 05/10/11 09:45 PM, Don wrote: Is it possible to modify the GUID associated with a ZFS volume imported into STMF? To clarify- I have a ZFS volume I have imported into STMF and export via iscsi. I have a number of snapshots of this volume. I need to temporarily go back to an older snapshot wit

[zfs-discuss] Backup complete rpool structure and data to tape

2011-05-11 Thread Arjun YK
Hello, Trying to understand how to backup mirrored zfs boot pool 'rpool' to tape, and restore it back if in case the disks are lost. Backup would be done with an enterprise tool like tsm, legato etc. As an example, here is the layout: # zfs list NAME USED AVAIL

Re: [zfs-discuss] Modify stmf_sbd_lu properties

2011-05-11 Thread Don
I can't actually disable the STMF framework to do this but I can try renaming things and dumping the properties from one device to another and see if it works- it might actually do it. I will let you know. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org __

Re: [zfs-discuss] Performance problem suggestions?

2011-05-11 Thread Jim Litchfield
Keep in mind zfs_vdev_max_pending. In the latest version of S10, this is set to 10. ZFS will not issue more than the value of this variable requests at a time for a LUN. Your disks may look relatively idle while ZFS has a lot of data piled up inside just waiting to be read or written. I have tweake

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS backup and restore

2011-05-11 Thread Naveen surisetty
Hi, Thanks for the response, Here is my problem. I have a zfs stream back up took on zfs version 15, currently i have upgraded my OS, so new zfs version is 22. Restore process went well from old stream backup to new zfs pool. but on reboot i got error unable to mount pool tank. So there is i

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS backup and restore

2011-05-11 Thread Jim Klimov
Sorry, I did not hit this type of error... AFAIK the pool writes during zfs receive are done by current code (i.e. ZFSv22 for you) based on data read from the backup stream. So unless there are corruptions on the pool which happened to be at the same time as you did your restore, this procedure

Re: [zfs-discuss] Performance problem suggestions?

2011-05-11 Thread Jim Klimov
> > Disks that have been in use for a longer time may have very fragmented free > > space on one hand, and not so much of it on another, but ZFS is still > > trying to push > > bits around evenly. And while it's waiting on some disks, others may be > > blocked as > > well. Something like that...

Re: [zfs-discuss] Modify stmf_sbd_lu properties

2011-05-11 Thread Jim Klimov
You can try to workaround - no idea if this would really work - 0) Disable stmf and iscsi/* services 1) Create your volume's clone 2) Rename the original live volume dataset to some other name 3) Rename the clone to original dataset's name 4) Promote the clone - now for the system it SHOULD seem li

Re: [zfs-discuss] bootfs ID on zfs root

2011-05-11 Thread Jim Klimov
Technically "bootfs ID" is a string which names the root dataset, typically "rpool/ROOT/solarisReleaseNameCode". This string can be passed to Solaris kernel as a parameter manually or by bootloader, otherwise a default current "bootfs" is read from the root pool's attributes (not dataset attribu

Re: [zfs-discuss] Summary: Dedup and L2ARC memory requirements

2011-05-11 Thread Frank Van Damme
Op 10-05-11 06:56, Edward Ned Harvey schreef: >> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- >> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey >> >> BTW, here's how to tune it: >> >> echo "arc_meta_limit/Z 0x3000" | sudo mdb -kw >> >> echo "::arc" | sudo mdb -k | gre