On 5/7/2011 6:47 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
See below. Right around 400,000 blocks, dedup is suddenly an order of
magnitude slower than without dedup.
40 10.7sec 136.7sec143 MB 195
MB
80 21.0sec 465.6sec287 MB 391
> See below. Right around 400,000 blocks, dedup is suddenly an order of
> magnitude slower than without dedup.
>
> 4010.7sec 136.7sec143 MB 195
MB
> 8021.0sec 465.6sec287 MB 391
MB
The interesting thing is
New problem:
I'm following all the advice I summarized into the OP of this thread, and
testing on a test system. (A laptop). And it's just not working. I am
jumping into the dedup performance abyss far, far eariler than predicted...
My test system is a laptop with 1.5G ram, c_min =150M, c_max
