On 3/21/2011 5:44 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
We do have support for running your own code using our API. Its just
that we can't reasonably be expected to support people who want do
things like... oh, "zpool import -f" (note the -f). Or editing
local configuration files that are also managed b
On Mar 24, 2011, at 5:42 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
>> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Nomen Nescio
>>
>> Hi ladies and gents, I've got a new Solaris 10 development box with ZFS
>> mirror root using 500G drives. I've got s
Michael DeMan wrote:
> Moving forward...
>
> If Oracle continues to release critical ZFS feature sets under CDDL to the
> community, then:
>
> A) They are no longer pre-releasing those features to OpenSolaris
> B) FreeBSD gets them at the same time.
>
> If Oracle does not continue to release ZFS
On Mar 24, 2011, at 02:03, Michael DeMan wrote:
> The only remaining question would be the remaining crufts of legal
> disposition. I could for instance see NetApp or somebody try and sue
> ixSystems, but I have a really, really rough time seeing Oracle/LarryEllison
> suing the FreeBSD foundat
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Giovanni Tirloni
>
> We've production servers with 9 vdev's (mirrored) doing `zfs send`
> daily to backup servers with with 7 vdev's (each 3-disk raidz1). Some
> backup servers that receive dat
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Nomen Nescio
>
> Hi ladies and gents, I've got a new Solaris 10 development box with ZFS
> mirror root using 500G drives. I've got several extra 320G drives and I'm
> wondering if there's any w
