Re: [zfs-discuss] detach configured log devices

2011-03-16 Thread webdawg
Jim, You should state your zfs version. Web... Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:33:58 -0400 From: Jim Mauro To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: [zfs-discuss] detach configured log devices? Message-ID: <2120fb95-809c-4f13-928b-898a7b937...@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Wi

Re: [zfs-discuss] "Invisible" snapshot/clone

2011-03-16 Thread Freddie Cash
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > P.S.  If your primary goal is to use ZFS, you would probably be better > switching to nexenta or openindiana or solaris 11 express, because they all > support ZFS much better than freebsd.  If instead, your primary goal is to > do somethi

Re: [zfs-discuss] "Invisible" snapshot/clone

2011-03-16 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Peter Jeremy > > I am in the process of upgrading from FreeBSD-8.1 with ZFSv14 to > FreeBSD-8.2 with ZFSv15 and, following a crash, have run into a > problem with ZFS claiming a snapshot or clo

[zfs-discuss] "Invisible" snapshot/clone

2011-03-16 Thread Peter Jeremy
I am in the process of upgrading from FreeBSD-8.1 with ZFSv14 to FreeBSD-8.2 with ZFSv15 and, following a crash, have run into a problem with ZFS claiming a snapshot or clone exists that I can't find. I was transferring a set of snapshots from my primary desktop to a backup host (both ZFSv14) usin

Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS

2011-03-16 Thread Cameron Hanover
I thought this explained it well. http://www.cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=939 'NFSv3, ACL's and ZFS' is the relevant part. I've told my customers that run into this to use the noacl mount option. - Cameron Hanover chano...@umich.edu Fill with mingled cream and amber, I will drain that

Re: [zfs-discuss] detach configured log devices?

2011-03-16 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Hi Jim, Yes, the Solaris 10 9/10 release supports log device removal. http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E19253-01/819-5461/gazgw/index.html See Example 4-3 in this section. The ability to import a pool with a missing log device is not yet available in the Solaris 10 release. Thanks, Cindy

Re: [zfs-discuss] detach configured log devices?

2011-03-16 Thread Bryan Horstmann-Allen
+-- | On 2011-03-16 12:33:58, Jim Mauro wrote: | | With ZFS, Solaris 10 Update 9, is it possible to | detach configured log devices from a zpool? | | I have a zpool with 3 F20 mirrors for the ZIL. They're | coming up corr

Re: [zfs-discuss] detach configured log devices?

2011-03-16 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:33:58AM -0700, Jim Mauro wrote: > With ZFS, Solaris 10 Update 9, is it possible to > detach configured log devices from a zpool? > > I have a zpool with 3 F20 mirrors for the ZIL. They're > coming up corrupted. I want to detach them, remake > the devices and reattach the

[zfs-discuss] detach configured log devices?

2011-03-16 Thread Jim Mauro
With ZFS, Solaris 10 Update 9, is it possible to detach configured log devices from a zpool? I have a zpool with 3 F20 mirrors for the ZIL. They're coming up corrupted. I want to detach them, remake the devices and reattach them to the zpool. Thanks /jim _

Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS

2011-03-16 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
/usr/bin/cp will work - the path on OpenIndiana has gnu in first, which is a bad thing imho - Original Message - Always show info like ‘operation not supported’. Any workaround? Thanks. Fred ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-di

Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS's ACL

2011-03-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Fred Liu wrote: > Sorry. I put post in cc. > I use NFSv3(linux 2.4 kernel) coreutils-8.9. On Linux, NFSv3 does not support ACLs at all. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill.

Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS's ACL

2011-03-16 Thread Fred Liu
Sorry. I put post in cc. I use NFSv3(linux 2.4 kernel) coreutils-8.9. Thanks. Fred -Original Message- From: David Magda [mailto:dma...@ee.ryerson.ca] Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 10:29 PM To: Fred Liu Cc: ZFS Discussions Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS

Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS's ACL

2011-03-16 Thread David Magda
On Wed, March 16, 2011 10:08, Fred Liu wrote: > Yeah. But we are on Linux NFS client. ;-( > > Is it doable to build SUN cp in Linux? Where can I find the source code? Are you using NFSv4? Also, what version of GNU coreutils are you using ('cp' is usually part of the "coreutils" package)? What dist

Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS's ACL

2011-03-16 Thread Fred Liu
Yeah. But we are on Linux NFS client. ;-( Is it doable to build SUN cp in Linux? Where can I find the source code? Thanks. Fred -Original Message- From: jason.brian.k...@gmail.com [mailto:jason.brian.k...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 10:06 PM To: Fred L

Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS's ACL

2011-03-16 Thread Jason
Use the Solaris cp (/usr/bin/cp) instead On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Fred Liu wrote: > It is from ZFS ACL. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Fred > > > > From: Fred Liu > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 9:57 PM > To: ZFS Discussions > Subject: GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS > > > > Alw

Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS's ACL

2011-03-16 Thread Fred Liu
It is from ZFS ACL. Thanks. Fred From: Fred Liu Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 9:57 PM To: ZFS Discussions Subject: GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS Always show info like 'operation not supported'. Any workaround? Thanks. Fred ___ zfs

[zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS

2011-03-16 Thread Fred Liu
Always show info like 'operation not supported'. Any workaround? Thanks. Fred ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] dual protocal on one file system?

2011-03-16 Thread Ross Walker
On Mar 16, 2011, at 8:13 AM, Paul Kraus wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Edward Ned Harvey > wrote: > >> BTW, what is the advantage of the kernel cifs server as opposed to samba? >> It seems, years ago, somebody must have been standing around and saying >> "There is a glaring deficien

Re: [zfs-discuss] dual protocal on one file system?

2011-03-16 Thread Paul Kraus
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > BTW, what is the advantage of the kernel cifs server as opposed to samba? > It seems, years ago, somebody must have been standing around and saying > "There is a glaring deficiency in samba, and we need to solve it." Complete integ