Re: [zfs-discuss] Slices and reservations Was: Re: How long should an empty destroy take? snv_134

2011-03-07 Thread Jim Dunham
Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- >> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Brandon High >> >> Write caching will be disabled on devices that use slices. It can be >> turned back on by using format -e > > My experience has been, despite wha

Re: [zfs-discuss] Slices and reservations Was: Re: How long should an empty destroy take? snv_134

2011-03-07 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Brandon High > > Write caching will be disabled on devices that use slices. It can be > turned back on by using format -e My experience has been, despite what the BPG (or whatever) says, this

Re: [zfs-discuss] Slices and reservations Was: Re: How long should an empty destroy take? snv_134

2011-03-07 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Yaverot > > >I recommend: > >When creating your new pool, use slices of the new disks, which are 99% of > >the size of the new disks instead of using the whole new disks. Because > >this is a

Re: [zfs-discuss] Slices and reservations Was: Re: How long should an empty destroy take? snv_134

2011-03-07 Thread Brandon High
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Yaverot wrote: > 1. While performance isn't my top priority, doesn't using slices make a > significant difference? Write caching will be disabled on devices that use slices. It can be turned back on by using format -e > 2. Doesn't snv_134 that I'm running already

[zfs-discuss] Slices and reservations Was: Re: How long should an empty destroy take? snv_134

2011-03-07 Thread Yaverot
I questioning these recommendations to increase my understanding. --- opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote: >From: Edward Ned Harvey >> From: Yaverot >> rpool remains 1% inuse. tank reports 100% full (with 1.44G free), >I recommend: >When creating your new pool, use sli

[zfs-discuss] zfs pool offline and resilvering

2011-03-07 Thread Fred
Hi all, I have two T5240 with LDOM and last night cause kernel patching on control domain and guest, I preferred put one mirror side in to offline state on the control domain, I tested the offline state with many reboot and was always ok ...one mirror "online" and one mirror "offline"...When I inst

[zfs-discuss] Solaris Express server name broadcast

2011-03-07 Thread Robert Soubie
Le 06/03/2011 00:14, "Hung-Sheng Tsao (Lao Tsao 老曹) Ph. D." a écrit : question to solaris forum http://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?objID=c300&q=Solaris Since you have been (and you alone) kind enough to try and help me, I will give you in writing a detailed explanation on how this me

Re: [zfs-discuss] How long should an empty destroy take? snv_134

2011-03-07 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Yaverot > > rpool remains 1% inuse. tank reports 100% full (with 1.44G free), I recommend: When creating your new pool, use slices of the new disks, which are 99% of the size of the new disks