> So, does anyone know which drives to choose for the next setup? Hitachis look
> good so far, perhaps also seagates, but right now, I'm dubious about the >
> blacks.
Hi! I'd go for WD RE edition. Blacks and Greens are for desktop use and
therefore lack proper TLER settings and have useless pow
On Feb 24, 2011, at 20:11, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> So, does anyone know which drives to choose for the next setup? Hitachis look
> good so far, perhaps also seagates, but right now, I'm dubious about the
> blacks.
There are people who have lost data on Seagates, and so swear they'll never
Hi all
I have about 350TB on ZFS now, and with an old box with WD Greens (those
getting replaced as of now), I've had very little drive failures. iostat -en
shows a minimum of errors, and all is well.
Then, the new 100TB setups are based on FASS drives (2TB WD Blacks). Those seem
to be rather
Ignore this post.
I managed to solve this problem.
On 24/02/2011 08:37, "Thierry Delaitre" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sbdadmin create-lu throws an sbdadm: data file error¹ error message on a
> cloned ZFS pool.
>
> The above works ok on a non-cloned FS. Is this not meant to work with comstar
> ?
>
Hello,
Sbdadmin create-lu throws an sbdadm: data file error¹ error message on a
cloned ZFS pool.
The above works ok on a non-cloned FS. Is this not meant to work with
comstar ?
Thierry.
--
The University of Westminster is a charity and a company limited by
guarantee. Registration number: 97
