Re: [zfs-discuss] smbd becomes unresponsive on snv_151a

2011-02-10 Thread Chris Forgeron
Are you running CIFS with any AD integration, or is it functioning in work-group mode? Do you have lockups only when you transfer a lot of data, or will it lock up without any machine working on the CIFS share? How long is "time to time"? -Original Message- From: zfs-discuss-boun...@op

[zfs-discuss] smbd becomes unresponsive on snv_151a

2011-02-10 Thread Marcis Lielturks
Hi! We have some trouble with CIFS. Two servers (n20 and n30), both configured the same way and running Solaris 11 Express snv_151a. From time to time CIFS service on n20 locks up, becomes unresponsive and impossible to restart, even "kill -9 " can't kill it. Only system reboot helps to solve t

[zfs-discuss] Very bad ZFS write performance. Ok Read.

2011-02-10 Thread ian W
Hi All. Hope you can still help here. Solaris 11 Express. x86 platform E6600 with 6GB of RAM I have a fairly new S11E box Im using as a file server. 3x1.5TB HDD's in a raidz pool. When I first set it up I was getting 110MB/sec writes across gigabit network via SMB shares. I noticed recently th

Re: [zfs-discuss] Drive i/o anomaly

2011-02-10 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> matt@vault:~$ zpool status > pool: rpool > state: ONLINE > scan: resilvered 588M in 0h3m with 0 errors on Fri Jan 7 07:38:06 2011 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 > mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c8t1d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c8t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > cache > c12d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and spindle speed (7.2k / 10k / 15k)

2011-02-10 Thread Joerg Schilling
Andrew Gabriel wrote: > If you go back to the late 1970's before tracks had embedded servo data, > on multi-platter disks you had one surface which contained the head > positioning servo data, and the drive relied on accurate vertical > alignment between heads/surfaces to keep on track (and dr