Pasi,
I have not tried the Opensolaris FMA yet.
But we have developed a tool called DSM that allow users to locate disk
drive location, failed drive identification, FRU parts status.
http://dataonstorage.com/dataon-products/dsm-30-for-nexentastor.html
We also spending time in past to sure SES
They have been incredibly reliable with zero downtime or issues. As a result,
we use 2 in every system striped. For one application outside of VDI, we use a
pair of them mirrored, but that is very unusual and driven by the customer and
not us.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
We are working on a change to illumos (and NexentaStor) to revive
acl_mode... lots and lots of people have had very bad experiences as a
result of that particular change.
- Garrett
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 07:32 +, Ryan John wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Frank Lahm [mai
On Jan 26, 2011, at 19:48, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> The scenario is as thus: We have a 50TB storage unit which was built to be an
> archive, but lately, scientists have been using this for a fileserver for
> modelling. Pracitaclly, this means 50+ processes doing more or less random
> i/o t
Hello all,
I want to reorganize the virtual disk/ storage pool /volume layout on a
StorageTek 6140 with two CSM200 expansion units attached (for example stripe
LUNs across trays, which is not the case at the moment). On a data server I
have a zpool "pool1" over one of the volumes on the Storage
> > Hi all
> >
> > Is there anything usable for zfs/openindiana that allows for
> > multi-tiered storage?
> >
> > The scenario is as thus: We have a 50TB storage unit which was built
> > to be an archive, but lately, scientists have been using this for a
> > fileserver for modelling. Pracitaclly, t
2011/1/27 Garrett D'Amore :
> We are working on a change to illumos (and NexentaStor) to revive
> acl_mode... lots and lots of people have had very bad experiences as a
> result of that particular change.
We had to put a chmod() wrapper into our app (Netatalk) to work around
that. Good to hear you
2011/1/27 Ryan John :
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Frank Lahm [mailto:frankl...@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: 25 January 2011 14:50
>> To: Ryan John
>> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Changed ACL behavior in snv_151 ?
>
>> John,
>
>> welcome onboard!
>
>> 2011/1/
Chris & Eff,
Thanks for your expertise on this and other posts. Greatly appreciated. I've
just been re-reading some of the great SSD-as-ZIL discussions.
Chris,
Cost: Our case is a bit non-representative as we have spare P410/512's that
came with ESXi hosts (USB boot) so I've budgetted them at
I don't disagree that zfs is the better choice, but...
> Seriously though. UFS is dead. It has no advantage
> over ZFS that I'm aware
> of.
>
When it comes to dumping and restoring filesystems, there is still no official
replacement for the ufsdump and ufsrestore. The discussion has been had
We tried all combinations of OCZ SSDs including their PCI based SSDs and they
do NOT work as a ZIL. After a very short time performance degrades horribly and
for the OCZ drives they eventually fail completely. We also tried Intel which
performed a little better and didn't flat out fail over time
11 matches
Mail list logo
