> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Bueno
>
> Is it true that a raidz2 pool has a read capacity equal to the slowest
disk's IOPs
> per second ??
No, but there's a grain of truth there.
Random reads:
* If you have a single proce
The discussion is really old: writing many small files on an nfs mounted zfs
filesystem is slow without ssd zil due to the sync nature of the nfs protocol
itself. But there is something I don't really understand. My tests on an old
opteron box with 2 small u160 scsi arrays and a zpool with 4 mir
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Steve Kellam
wrote:
> I set this up about a year ago and have had very few problems. I was
> streaming a movie off the server a few days ago and it all of a sudden lost
> connectivity with the server. When I checked the server, there was no output
> on the dis
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Oh, and with 4x 3 TByte SATA mirrored pool is pretty much without
> alternative, right?
You can also use raidz2, which will have a little more resiliency.
With mirroring, you can lose one disk without data loss, but losing a
second disk might
My first inclination is 128k is too small for a pool component.
You might try something more reasonable, like 1G, if you're
just testing.
Thanks,
Cindy
# zfs create -V 2g sanpool/vol1
# stmfadm create-lu /dev/zvol/rdsk/sanpool/vol1
Logical unit created: 600144F0C49A05004CC84BE20001
On 01/
Hi all,
I've been following the Oracle Solaris ZFS Administration guide here:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E19963-01/821-1448/ftyxh/index.html
I am able to create my ZFS volume but am having trouble when I get to the step
of creating a LUN using sbdadm, it will inevitably return the "sbda
On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>>> I'd expect more than 105290K/s on a sequential read as a peak for a single
>>> drive, let alone a striped set. The system has a relatively decent CPU,
>>> however only 2GB memory, do you think increasing this to 4GB would
>>> noticeably affect
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:07:50AM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
> > I'd expect more than 105290K/s on a sequential read as a peak for a single
> > drive, let alone a striped set. The system has a relatively decent CPU,
> > however only 2GB memory, do you think increasing this to 4GB would
> > n
Hi Steve,
Anything in:
cat /var/adm/messages
fmdump -ev
?
..Remco
On 1/20/11 1:47 AM, Steve Kellam wrote:
I have a home media server set up using OpenSolaris. All my experience with
OpenSolaris has been through setting up and maintaining this server so it is
rather limited. I have run
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:47, Steve Kellam
wrote:
> I have a home media server set up using OpenSolaris. All my experience with
> OpenSolaris has been through setting up and maintaining this server so it is
> rather limited. I have run in to some problems recently and I am not sure
> how t
I have a home media server set up using OpenSolaris. All my experience with
OpenSolaris has been through setting up and maintaining this server so it is
rather limited. I have run in to some problems recently and I am not sure how
the best way to troubleshoot this. I was hoping to get some
We are using the following equipment:
- 12 x WD RE3 1TB SATA
- 1 x lsi 1068e HBA
- supermicro expander
- xeon 5520 / 12gb memory
We're having very slow read performance on our san/nas. We have one raidz2 pool
of 12 devices. We use the pool for iscsi ( xenserver virtual machines) + cifs
share.
12 matches
Mail list logo
