Tim Cook cook.ms> writes:
> You are not a court of law, and that statement has not been tested. It is
your opinion and nothing more. I'd appreciate if every time you repeated that
statement, you'd preface it with "in my opinion" so you don't have people
running around believing what they're doi
On Dec 22, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Bill Werner wrote:
>>> got it attached to a UPS with very conservative
>> shut-down timing. Or
>>> are there other host failures aside from power a
>> ZIL would be
>>> vulnerable too (system hard-locks?)?
>>
>> Correct, a system hard-lock is another example...
>
> H
On 24/12/2010 18:21, Richard Elling wrote:
Latency is what matters most. While there is a loose relationship
between IOPS
and latency, you really want low latency. For 15krpm drives, the
average latency
is 2ms for zero seeks. A decent SSD will beat that by an order of
magnitude.
And the cl
On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:25 AM, Stephan Budach wrote:
> as I have learned from the discussion about which SSD to use as ZIL drives, I
> stumbled across this article, that discusses short stroking for increasing
> IOPs on SAS and SATA drives:
>
> http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/short-stroking-hd
> From: Frank Lahm [mailto:frankl...@googlemail.com]
>
> With Netatalk for AFP he _is_ running a database: any AFP server needs
> to maintain a consistent mapping between _not reused_ catalog node ids
> (CNIDs) and filesystem objects. Luckily for Apple, HFS[+] and their
> Cocoa/Carbon APIs provide
Thanks for the clarification. I guess I need to go back and figure out how ZFS
crypto keying is performed. I guess most likely the key is generated from some
sort of one-way hash from a passphrase?
- Garrett
-Original Message-
From: Darren J Moffat [mailto:darren.mof...@oracle.com]