Re: [zfs-discuss] Growing the swap vol?

On 11/14/10 12:00 PM, Kyle McDonald wrote: Hi all, I'd like to give my machine a little more swap. I ran: zfs get volsize rpool/swap and saw it was 2G So I ran: zfs set volsize=4G rpool/swap to double it. zfs get shows it took affect, but swap -l doesn't show any change. I ran swap -d to r

[zfs-discuss] Growing the swap vol?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'd like to give my machine a little more swap. I ran: zfs get volsize rpool/swap and saw it was 2G So I ran: zfs set volsize=4G rpool/swap to double it. zfs get shows it took affect, but swap -l doesn't show any change. I ran swap -d

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Administation Concole

Now I feel stupid lol. Thanks for the clarification! On 13 Nov 2010 22:30, "Erik Trimble" wrote: > On 11/13/2010 1:56 PM, Khushil Dep wrote: >> >> Wait I thought the x4/x7 was the thumper series? >> > > Nope. Thumper is specifically the codename for the X4500. ONLY the x4500. > > -Erik > > >>

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Administation Concole

On 11/13/2010 1:56 PM, Khushil Dep wrote: Wait I thought the x4/x7 was the thumper series? Nope. Thumper is specifically the codename for the X4500. ONLY the x4500. -Erik On 13 Nov 2010 21:54, "Erik Trimble" > wrote: > On 11/13/2010 1:06 PM, Khushil De

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Administation Concole

Ok so what range was the thumper? On 13 Nov 2010 22:00, "Tim Cook" wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Erik Trimble wrote: > >> On 11/13/2010 1:06 PM, Khushil Dep wrote: >> >> Think those might have been the thumper screen shots? Take a look at >> nexentastor >> >> On 13 Nov 2010 20:12,

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Administation Concole

On 11/13/2010 2:00 PM, Tim Cook wrote: On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Erik Trimble > wrote: On 11/13/2010 1:06 PM, Khushil Dep wrote: Think those might have been the thumper screen shots? Take a look at nexentastor On 13 Nov 2010 20:12,

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Administation Concole

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Erik Trimble wrote: > On 11/13/2010 1:06 PM, Khushil Dep wrote: > > Think those might have been the thumper screen shots? Take a look at > nexentastor > > On 13 Nov 2010 20:12, "Brad Henderson" > wrote: > > I am new to OpenSolaris and I have been reading abou

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Administation Concole

Wait I thought the x4/x7 was the thumper series? On 13 Nov 2010 21:54, "Erik Trimble" wrote: > On 11/13/2010 1:06 PM, Khushil Dep wrote: >> >> Think those might have been the thumper screen shots? Take a look at >> nexentastor >> >> On 13 Nov 2010 20:12, "Brad Henderson" >

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Administation Concole

On 11/13/2010 1:06 PM, Khushil Dep wrote: Think those might have been the thumper screen shots? Take a look at nexentastor On 13 Nov 2010 20:12, "Brad Henderson" > wrote: > I am new to OpenSolaris and I have been reading about and seeing screenshots o

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Administation Concole

Think those might have been the thumper screen shots? Take a look at nexentastor On 13 Nov 2010 20:12, "Brad Henderson" wrote: > I am new to OpenSolaris and I have been reading about and seeing screenshots of the ZFS Administration Console. I have been looking at the dates on it and every pos

[zfs-discuss] ZFS Administation Concole

I am new to OpenSolaris and I have been reading about and seeing screenshots of the ZFS Administration Console. I have been looking at the dates on it and every post is from about two years ago. I am just wondering is this option not available on OpenSolaris anymore and if it is how do I set it

Re: [zfs-discuss] Maximum zfs send/receive throughput

> Does this maybe ring a bell with someone? Update: The cause of the problem was OpenSolaris bug 6826836 "Deadlock possible in dmu_object_reclaim() http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6826836 It could be fixed by upgrading the OpenSolaris 2009.06 system to 0.5.11-0.111.17