> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Skwar
>
> I've got a Solaris 10 10/08 Sparc system and use ZFS pool version 15. I'm
> playing around a bit to make it break.
>
> Now I write some garbage to one of the log mirror dev
On 11/13/10 04:03 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Since combining ZFS storage backend, via nfs or iscsi, with ESXi
heads, I’m in love. But for one thing. The interconnect between the
head & storage.
1G Ether is so cheap, but not as fast as desired. 10G ether is fast
enough, but it’s overkill a
Check infiniband, the guys at anandtech/zfsbuild.com used that as well.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Nov 12, 2010, at 5:54 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>
> Why are you sharing iscsi from nexenta to freebsd? Wouldn't it be better
> for nexenta to simply create zfs filesystems, and then share nfs? Much more
> flexible in a lot of ways. Unless your design requirements require limiting
> the
Hi Rainer,
I haven't seen this in a while but I wonder if you just need to set the
bootfs property on your new root pool and/or reapplying the bootblocks.
Can you import this pool booting from a LiveCD and to review the
bootfs property value? I would also install the boot blocks on the
rpool2
ESX does not support LACP, only static trunking with a host-configured path
selection algorithm.
Look at Infiniband. Even QDR (32 Gbit) is cheaper per port than most 10GbE
solutions I've seen, and SDR/DDR certainly is. If you want to connect ESX to
storage directly via IB you will find some lim
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:34:48AM -0600, Tim Cook wrote:
> Channeling Ethernet will not make it any faster. Each individual connection
> will be limited to 1gbit. iSCSI with mpxio may work, nfs will not.
Would NFSv4 as cluster system over multiple boxes work?
(This question is not limited to ESX
Channeling Ethernet will not make it any faster. Each individual connection
will be limited to 1gbit. iSCSI with mpxio may work, nfs will not.
On Nov 12, 2010 9:26 AM, "Eugen Leitl" wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:03:08AM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> Since combining ZFS storage backend,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/12/2010 10:03 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>
> Since combining ZFS storage backend, via nfs or iscsi, with ESXi
> heads, I?m in love. But for one thing. The interconnect between
> the head & storage.
>
>
>
> 1G Ether is so cheap, but not as f
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:03:08AM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> Since combining ZFS storage backend, via nfs or iscsi, with ESXi heads, I'm
> in love. But for one thing. The interconnect between the head & storage.
>
>
>
> 1G Ether is so cheap, but not as fast as desired. 10G ether is f
Since combining ZFS storage backend, via nfs or iscsi, with ESXi heads, I'm
in love. But for one thing. The interconnect between the head & storage.
1G Ether is so cheap, but not as fast as desired. 10G ether is fast enough,
but it's overkill and why is it so bloody expensive? Why is there
Hi Henrik
Yes I have the following concerns….. and as I haven’t done any practical tests
this is only “in theory”….
1.
Reclaiming thin devices will not work, EMC have a 768K byte minimum reclaim
limit (768Kbytes needs to be all zeros). And HDS have 42MB I believe, IBM and
3PAR I don’t kn
On Nov 12, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hm. Why are there no errors shown for the logs devices?
You need to crash you machine while log devices are in use, then you'll see
some reads on the next reboot. "In use" here means that system is actively
writing to log devices at the tim
Hello!
I've got a Solaris 10 10/08 Sparc system and use ZFS pool version 15. I'm
playing
around a bit to make it break.
I've created a mirrored "Test" pool using mirrored log devices:
# zpool create Test \
mirror /dev/zvol/dsk/data/DiskNr1 /dev/zvol/dsk/data/DiskNr2 \
log mirror /dev/zvo
On 12/11/2010 13:01, sridhar surampudi wrote:
How I can I quiesce / freeze all writes to zfs and zpool if want to take
hardware level snapshots or array snapshot of all devices under a pool ?
are there any commands or ioctls or apis available ?
zpool export
zpool import
That is the only doc
Hi,
How I can I quiesce / freeze all writes to zfs and zpool if want to take
hardware level snapshots or array snapshot of all devices under a pool ?
are there any commands or ioctls or apis available ?
Thanks & Regards,
sridhar.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
>
> >> 1) The ZFS box offers a single iSCSI target that exposes all the
> >> zvols as individual disks. When the FreeBSD initiator finds it, it
> >> creates a sepa
Hi,
I am having a corrupted dataset, that caused a kernel panic upon
imporing/mounting the zpool/dataset. (see this thread
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=135269&tstart=0)
Now, I do have number of snapshots on this dataset and I am wondering, if
there's a way to check if a clo
18 matches
Mail list logo
