On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Joe Auty wrote:
> Thomas Burgess wrote:
>
>
>> Yeah, this is what I was thinking too...
>>
>> Is there anyway to retain snapshot data this way? I've read about the ZFS
>> replay/mirror features, but my impression was that this was more so for a
>> development
>
>
> Yeah, this is what I was thinking too...
>
> Is there anyway to retain snapshot data this way? I've read about the ZFS
> replay/mirror features, but my impression was that this was more so for a
> development mirror for testing rather than a reliable backup? This is the
> only way I know of
Hello all,
I've been running OpenSolaris on my personal fileserver for about a year and a
half, and it's been rock solid except for having to upgrade from 2009.06 to a
dev version to fix some network driver issues. About a month ago, the
motherboard on this computer died, and I upgraded to a b
On 06/12/10 17:13, zfsnoob4 wrote:
Thanks. As I discovered from that post, VB does not have cache flush enabled by
default. Ignoreflush must be explicitly turned off.
VBoxManage setextradata VMNAME
"VBoxInternal/Devices/piix3ide/0/LUN#[x]/Config/IgnoreFlush" 0
where VMNAME is the name of your
Thanks. As I discovered from that post, VB does not have cache flush enabled by
default. Ignoreflush must be explicitly turned off.
VBoxManage setextradata VMNAME
"VBoxInternal/Devices/piix3ide/0/LUN#[x]/Config/IgnoreFlush" 0
where VMNAME is the name of your virtual machine.
Although I tried
On 6/12/2010 1:44 PM, andrew wrote:
On 6/10/2010 9:04 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Anurag
Agarwal wrote:
We at KQInfotech, initially started on an
independent port of ZFS to linux.
When we posted our prog
On Jun 12, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Jan Hellevik wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. The thread on FreeBSD mentions creating symlinks for
> the fdisk partitions. So did you earlier in this thread. I tried that but it
> did not help - you can see the result in my earlier reply to your previous
> message in
> On 6/10/2010 9:04 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Anurag
> Agarwal wrote:
> >
> >> We at KQInfotech, initially started on an
> independent port of ZFS to linux.
> >> When we posted our progress about port last year,
> then we came to know about
> >>
Thanks for the reply. The thread on FreeBSD mentions creating symlinks for the
fdisk partitions. So did you earlier in this thread. I tried that but it did
not help - you can see the result in my earlier reply to your previous message
in this thread.
Is this the way to go? Should I try again wi
On Jun 12, 2010, at 3:45 AM, Jan Hellevik wrote:
> Hi! Sorry for the late reply - I have been busy at work and this had to wait.
> The system has been powered off since my last post.
>
> The computer is new - built it to use as file server at home. I have not seen
> any strange behaviour (othe
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Op Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:00:39 +0200 schreef Joerg Schilling
:
The main problem with GPL related license debates seems to be that
very few people did read the GPL license text.
Or simply do not want to and just believe what they have been told to be
> >op> I was setting up a new systen (osol 2009.06
> and updating to
> >op> the lastest version of osol/dev - snv_134 -
> with
> >op> deduplication) and then I tried to import my
> backup zpool, but
> >op> it does not work.
> >
> >op> # zpool import -f tank1
> >op> canno
Op Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:00:39 +0200 schreef Joerg Schilling
:
The main problem with GPL related license debates seems to be that
very few people did read the GPL license text.
Or simply do not want to and just believe what they have been told to be
the truth.
If things are told often enough
I'm guessing that the virtualbox VM is ignoring write cache flushes. See this
for more ifno:
http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=13661
On 12 Jun, 2010, at 5.30, zfsnoob4 wrote:
> Thanks, that works. But it only when I do a proper export first.
>
> If I export the pool then I can
Hi! Sorry for the late reply - I have been busy at work and this had to wait.
The system has been powered off since my last post.
The computer is new - built it to use as file server at home. I have not seen
any strange behaviour (other than this). All parts are brand new (except for
the disks
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> I am really sad to hear you saying these things since if it was all
> actually true, then Linux, *BSD, and Solaris distributions could not
> legally exist. Thankfully, only part of the above is true.
If linking of independent works would create something else than a
(p
Thanks, that works. But it only when I do a proper export first.
If I export the pool then I can import with:
zpool import -d /
(test files are located in /)
but if I destroy the pool, then I can no longer import it back, even though the
files are still there. Is this normal?
Thanks for your h
17 matches
Mail list logo
