I had an unclean shutdown because of a hang and suddenly my pool is degraded (I
realized something is wrong when python dumped core a couple of times).
This is before I ran scrub:
pool: mypool
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
corru
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, zfsnoob4 wrote:
I guess its not that useful to begin with, and without Trim the
write performance will start to drop off anyways.
It is not necessarily true that SSD write performance will drop off
over time without TRIM. It depends on how the SSD is designed.
Bob
--
B
On Jun 5, 2010, at 1:30 PM, zfsnoob4 wrote:
> I guess its not that useful to begin with, and without Trim the write
> performance will start to drop off anyways.
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, file systems which are not
COW unquestionably gain benefits with TRIM. ZFS uses COW and
I was talking about a write cache (slog/zil I suppose). This is just a media
server for home. The idea is when I copy an HD video from my camera to the
network drive it is always several GBs. So if it could copy the file to the SSD
first and then have it slowly copy to the normal HDs that would
On 06/05/2010 01:08 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
>
>> >>
>> >> The problem is that just using rsync I am not getting gigabit. For me
>> >> gigabit maxes out at around 930-940 megabits. When I use rsync alone I
>> >> only was getting around 720 megabi
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
The problem is that just using rsync I am not getting gigabit. For me
gigabit maxes out at around 930-940 megabits. When I use rsync alone I
only was getting around 720 megabits incomming. This is only when its
reading from the block device. When readin
Hi,
apologies for posting a fishworks-related question here, but I don't know of a
better place (please tell me if that exists).
Can anyone say anything about (planned) options to stretch out a storage 7000
series cluster for longer distances than what eSAS allows (prefarrable for more
than 1km)?
Hi,
thanks for helping me.
I wanted to solve the problem with logfix, but I'm not able to compile this.
Where could I find a newer version of logfix to try it again.
Regards,
Ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing lis
Arne Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I have a setup with thousands of filesystems, each containing several
snapshots. For a good percentage of these filesystems I want to create
a snapshots once every hour, for others once every 2 hours and so forth.
I built some tools to do this, no problem so far.
While ex
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
But what about the parity? Obviously it has to be checked, but I can't
find
any indications for it in the literature. The man page only states that
the
data is being checksummed and only if that fails the redundancy is being
used.
Please tell me I'm wrong ;)
I believe y
10 matches
Mail list logo
