Russ Price fubegra.net> writes:
>
> > Did you enable AHCI mode on _every_ SATA controller?
> >
> > I have the exact opposite experience with 2 of your 3
> > types of controllers.
>
> It wasn't possible to do so, and that also made me think that a real HBA would
work better. First off, with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12.03.2010 21:34, Greg wrote:
> Yes it would, however we only have the restore/verify portion. Unless of
> course I am overlooking something.
I think those can be tweaked further, now that I know Bacula accepts
plugins in this fashion (I didn't k
Yes it would, however we only have the restore/verify portion. Unless of course
I am overlooking something.
Thanks,
Greg
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/m
Wouldn't his scripts in the other thread (zfs send plugin for Bacula) work with
zvol as well?
//Svein
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-
Hey Miles,
Do you have any idea if there is a way to backup a zvol in the manner you speak
of with bacula? Is DD a secure way to do this or are there better methods to do
this? Otherwise I will just use dd. Thanks again!
Thanks!
Greg
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Hi David,
Make sure you test booting from the newly attached disk and update the
BIOS, if necessary.
The boot process occurs over several stages. I'm not sure what the
zfs_stage1_5 file provides but is the first two that we need for
booting.
For more details, go to this site:
http://hub.openso
On Mar 11, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Hi David,
In general, an I/O error means that the slice 0 doesn't exist
or some other problem exists with the disk.
Which makes complete sense because the partition table on the
replacement didn't have anything specified for slice 0.
Ian,
You might consider converting this pool to a mirrored pool, which is
currently more flexible than a raidz pool and provide good performance.
Its easy too. See the example below.
Cindy
A non-redundant pool of one disk (33 GB).
# zpool status tank
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
scrub: none r
Given that quote a few folk ask "which is the best SSD?", I thought some
folk might find the following interesting:
http://www.storagenewsletter.com/news/flash/dramexchange-intel-ssds
-marc
P.S: Apologies if the slightly off-topic post offends anyone.
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Kashif Mumtaz wrote:
We are facing an issue while enabling DIRECT_IO for the DB chunks.
The error message which appears in the online.log file is "Direct I/O cannot be used for
the chunk file "
Kindly help me in this regard .How can I overcome this
ZFS does not support
Dedhi Sujatmiko wrote:
As a user of el-cheapo US$18 SIL3114, I managed to make the system
freeze continuously when one of SATA cable got disconnected. I am
using 8 disks RAIDZ2 driven by 2 x SIL3114
System is still able to answer the ping, but SSH and console are no
longer responsive, obviously
> Did you enable AHCI mode on _every_ SATA controller?
>
> I have the exact opposite experience with 2 of your 3
> types of controllers.
It wasn't possible to do so, and that also made me think that a real HBA would
work better. First off, with the AMD SB700/SB800 on-board ports, if I set the
l
> I don't think retransmissions of b0rken packets is a problem anymore,
> most people
> use ssh which provides good error detection at a fine grain. It is
> rare that one would
> need to resend an entire ZFS dump stream when using ssh (or TLS or ...)
>
> Archival tape systems are already designed
Thats fair enough, pity there isn't a simpler way.
Many thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 12 March, 2010 - Erik Trimble sent me these 0,7K bytes:
> Ian Garbutt wrote:
>> I was wondering if there is any way of converting a zpool which only have
>> one LUN in there to a raidz zpool that was 3 or more LUNS in it?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
> No.
>
> Adding, removing, or otherwise changing dis
Ian Garbutt wrote:
I was wondering if there is any way of converting a zpool which only have one
LUN in there to a raidz zpool that was 3 or more LUNS in it?
Thanks
No.
Adding, removing, or otherwise changing disks in a RAIDZ is not possible
without destroying data in the pool.
You'll
I was wondering if there is any way of converting a zpool which only have one
LUN in there to a raidz zpool that was 3 or more LUNS in it?
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http:
> On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Tonmaus wrote:
> All of the other potential disk controllers line up
> ahead of it. For example,
> you will see controller numbers assigned for your CD,
> floppy, USB, SD, CF etc.
> -- richard
Hi Richard,
thanks for the explanation. Actually, I started to worry a
Russ Price fubegra.net> writes:
>
> I had recently started setting up a homegrown OpenSolaris NAS with
> a large RAIDZ2 pool, and had found its RAIDZ2 performance severely
> lacking - more like downright atrocious. As originally set up:
>
> * Asus M4A785-M motherboard
> * Phenom II X2 550 Black
On Mar 11, 2010, at 11:28 PM, Paul Tetley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My zpool is reporting unrecoverable errors with the metadata:
>
>pool: rpool2
> state: ONLINE
> status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
> corruption. Applications may be effected.
> a
20 matches
Mail list logo
