Eric, thanks for clarifying.
Could you confirm the release for #1 ? As "today" can be misleading depending
on the user.
Is there a schedule/target for #2 ?
And just to confirm the alternative to turn off the ZIL globally is the
equivalent to always throwing away some commited data on a crash/r
On Feb 6, 2010, at 10:18 PM, Christo Kutrovsky wrote:
> Me too, I would like to know the answer.
>
> I am considering Gigabyte's i-RAM for ZIL, but I don't want to worry what
> happens if the battery dies after a system crash.
There are two different things here:
1. Opening a pool with a mis
Me too, I would like to know the answer.
I am considering Gigabyte's i-RAM for ZIL, but I don't want to worry what
happens if the battery dies after a system crash.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@o
I've got a strange issue, If this is covered elsewhere, i apologize in
advance for my newbness
I've got a couple ZFS filesystems shared cifs and nfs, i've managed to get
ACL's working the way i want, provided things are accessed via cifs and nfs.
If i create a new dir via cifs or NFS then the ac
> I like the original Phenom X3 or X4
we all agree ram is the key to happiness. The debate is what offers the most ECC
ram for the least $. I failed to realize the AM3 cpus accepted UnBuffered ECC
DDR3-1333
like Lynnfield. To use Intel's 6 slots vs AMD 4 slots, one must use Registered
ECC.
So t
For those who've been suffering this problem and who have non-Sun
jbods, could you please let me know what model of jbod and cables
(including length thereof) you have in your configuration.
For those of you who have been running xVM without MSI support,
could you please confirm whether the devic
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Rob Logan wrote:
Intel's RAM is faster because it needs to be.
I'm confused how AMD's dual channel, two way interleaved
128-bit DDR2-667 into an on-cpu controller is faster than
Intel's Lynnfield dual channel, Rank and Channel interleaved
DDR3-1333 in
Hy Cindy,
thanks for the hint. Nice feature, if I see that is not yet
implemented on Solaris10 (i have on production system the Update8 for
now). Right? Do you have a roadmap when this happen?
By the way, having zpool with mirroring, I'll try to follow the first
part of Mark blog to have a second
"Kjetil Torgrim Homme" writes:
>yes, File Events Notification (FEN)
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/praks/entry/file_events_notification
>
>you access this through the event port API.
>
> http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/event_completion.html
>
>gnome-vfs uses FEN, but unfortunately gnomevfs-m
"Nilsen, Vidar" writes:
> And once an hour I run a script that checks for new dirs last 60
> minutes matching some criteria, and outputs the path to an
> IRC-channel. Where we can see if someone else has added new stuff.
>
> Method used is “find –mmin -60”, which gets horrible slow when more
> da
On 2/6/10 4:51 PM +0100 Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
the pricing does look strange, and I think it would be better to raise
the price of the enclosure (which is silly cheap when empty IMHO) and
reduce the drive prices somewhat. but that's just psychology, and
doesn't really matter for total cost.
> > Well, ok, and in my limited knowhow... zfs set checksum=sha256 only
> > covers user scribbled data [POSIX file metadata, file contents, directory
> > structure, ZVOL blocks] and not necessarily any zfs filesystem internals.
>
> metadata is fletcher4 except for the uberblocks which are self-
how can I delete obsolete BEs if I have run out of space and have to boot
from LiveCD?
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> On 02/06/10 08:38, Frank Middleton wrote:
>
>> AFAIK there is no way to get around this. You can set a flag so that pkg
>> tries to empty /var/pkg/downl
On 02/ 6/10 11:50 AM, Thorsten Hirsch wrote:
Uhmm... well, no, but there might be something left over.
When I was doing an image-update last time, my / ran out of space. I
even couldn't beadm destroy any old boot environment, because beadm
told me that there's no space left. So what I did was "z
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Rob Logan wrote:
Intel's RAM is faster because it needs to be.
I'm confused how AMD's dual channel, two way interleaved
128-bit DDR2-667 into an on-cpu controller is faster than
Intel's Lynnfield dual channel, Rank and Channel interleaved
DDR3-1333 into an on-cpu controller.
On 02/06/10 08:38, Frank Middleton wrote:
AFAIK there is no way to get around this. You can set a flag so that pkg
tries to empty /var/pkg/downloads, but even though it looks empty, it
won't actually become empty until you delete the snapshots, and IIRC
you still have to manually delete the conte
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:50 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>>> Perhaps I meant to say that the box itself [cpu/ram/bus/nic/io, except disk]
>>> is assumed to handle data with integrity. So say netcat is used as
>>> transport,
>>> zfs is using sha256 on disk, but only fletcher4 over the wire with
>>> send/recv
Hi Cesare,
If you want another way to replicate pools, you might be interested
in the zpool split feature that Mark Musante integrated recently.
You can read about it here:
http://blogs.sun.com/mmusante/entry/seven_years_of_good_luck
Cindy
- Original Message -
From: Cesare
Date: Sa
"Nilsen, Vidar" wrote:
> Method used is "find -mmin -60", which gets horrible slow when more data
> is added.
This is a questionable "feature" from GNU find.
A standard compliant extension with this ad more features is:
find -mtime -1h
See also sfind which is in:
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/sch
Uhmm... well, no, but there might be something left over.
When I was doing an image-update last time, my / ran out of space. I even
couldn't beadm destroy any old boot environment, because beadm told me that
there's no space left. So what I did was "zfs destroy
/rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-6". After
On 02/ 6/10 11:21 AM, Thorsten Hirsch wrote:
I wonder where ~10G have gone. All the subdirs in / use ~4.5G only
(that might be the size of REFER in opensolaris-7), and my $HOME uses
38.5M, that's correct. But since rpool has a size of> 15G there must
be more than 10G somewhere.
Do you have an
zpool tells me the following details for my rpool:
SIZE=16G
ALLOC=14.5G
FREE=1.36G
CAP=91%
and zfs tells me these stats:
rpool
USED=15.1G
AVAIL=505M
REFER=83K
MOUNTPOINT=/rpool
rpool/ROOT
USED=14.3G
AVAIL=505M
REFER=21K
MOUNTPOINT=legacy
rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-7
USED=14.3G
AVAIL=505M
REFER=
> b> (4) Hold backups from windows machines, mac (time machine),
> b> linux.
>
> for time machine you will probably find yourself using COMSTAR and the
> GlobalSAN iSCSI initiator because Time Machine does not seem willing
> to work over NFS. Otherwise, for Macs you should definitely us
Hi,
I have a fileserver at home, where my household stores common data, like
downloaded content, pictures etc..
And once an hour I run a script that checks for new dirs last 60
minutes matching some criteria, and outputs the path to an IRC-channel.
Where we can see if someone else has added n
Frank Cusack writes:
> On 2/4/10 8:00 AM +0100 Tomas Ögren wrote:
>> The "find -newer blah" suggested in other posts won't catch newer
>> files with an old timestamp (which could happen for various reasons,
>> like being copied with kept timestamps from somewhere else).
>
> good point. that is d
matthew patton writes:
> true. but I buy a Ferrari for the engine and bodywork and chassis
> engineering. It is totally criminal what Sun/EMC/Dell/Netapp do
> charging customers 10x the open-market rate for standard drives. A
> RE3/4 or NS drive is the same damn thing no matter if I buy it from
>
Alexandre MOREL writes:
> It's a few day now that I try to use a 9650SE 3ware controller to work
> on opensolaris and I found the following problem : the tw driver seems
> work, I can see my controller whith the tw_cli of 3ware. I can see
> that 2 drives are created with the controller, but when
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 1:32 AM, J wrote:
> saves me hundreds on HW-based RAID controllers ^_^
... which you might need to fork over to buy additional memory or faster CPU :P
Don't get me wrong, zfs is awesome, but to do so it needs more CPU
power and RAM (and possibly SSD) compared to other file
On 06/02/2010 02:38, Ross Walker wrote:
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Actually, there is.
One difference is that when writing to a raid-z{1|2} pool compared to
raid-10 pool you should get better throughput if at least 4 drives
are used. Basically it is due to the fact
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:39 PM, A Darren Dunham wrote:
> Just install a new OS, attach the disks, and do a 'zfs import' to find
> the importable pools.
The same behaviuor will be applied to move to another host the same
ZFS pool (with the same or major ZFS version). I use this feature
sometime to
30 matches
Mail list logo
