Chris,
Thanks for providing the details and the dump.
I shall look into this and update with my findings.
Thanks and regards,
Sanjeev
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 05:53:12PM -0700, Chris Baker wrote:
> Hi Sanjeev
>
> OK - had a chance to do more testing over the weekend. Firstly some extra
> data:
Matt,
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:28:50AM -0700, Matt Ingenthron wrote:
> > If ZFS is not beinng used significantly, then ARC
> > should not grow. ARC grows
> > based on the usage (ie. amount of ZFS files/data
> > accessed). Hence, if you are
> > sure that the ZFS usage is low, things should be
>
While it is true that you can not add a single device to a raidz vdev, you
can easily add more vdevs, and this is by far the best way to grow because
each vdev adds much speed to the array. Raidz is more advanced than raid5,
the fact that your card doesn't do the raid calculations is not a
limitat
Hi guys,
Previously, I had three 1TB drives in my desktop using the Intel's southbridge
RAID for storage. The only problem with that is every time Windows Vista took
a dump, I would be in jeopardy of corrupting the storage space; thus, I decided
to have a dedicated machine just for serving up
Hi Kyle,
AMD/ATI SB700/750 will use 64-bit DMA for data transfer with Solaris
ahci driver since snv_116.
Morever Solaris ahci driver has already supported nVidia AHCI SATA
controller.(0x10de,0ad4).
Thanks,
- ying -
Kyle McDonald wrote:
Hi all,
I think I've read that the AMD 790FX/750SB
Hi Sanjeev
OK - had a chance to do more testing over the weekend. Firstly some extra data:
Moving the mirror to both drives on ICH10R ports and on sudden disk power-off
the mirror faulted cleanly to the remaining drive no problem.
Having a one drive pool on the ICH10R under heavy write traffic
Hi all,
I wrote a little java program that combines Rsync and ZFS snapshots to backup
remote servers.
configuration is really easy, check it out at
http://projects.firefang.net/wiki/Zync
Comments are most welcomed.
Omry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Mike Gerdts wrote:
This was previously discussed...
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2008-July/019762.html
Thanks for the pointer (I remember this being discussed, but couldn't
find it again). That seems to be pretty much the same as what I came up
with.
The difference wi
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Menno Lageman wrote:
> Having to type the full dataset names as arguments to zfs(1M), e.g.
>
> $ zfs snapshot rpool/export/home/ml93401/onnv-cl...@onnv_121
> $ zfs clone rpool/export/home/ml93401/onnv-cl...@onnv_121 \
> rpool/export/home/ml93401/ws/somebugfix
> $
Having to type the full dataset names as arguments to zfs(1M), e.g.
$ zfs snapshot rpool/export/home/ml93401/onnv-cl...@onnv_121
$ zfs clone rpool/export/home/ml93401/onnv-cl...@onnv_121 \
rpool/export/home/ml93401/ws/somebugfix
$ cd ws/somewbugfix
[do some work]
$ zfs snapshot rpool/export
Ian Collins wrote:
Adam Sherman wrote:
On 6-Aug-09, at 15:16 , Ian Collins wrote:
This ended up being a costly mistake, the environment I ended up
with didn't play well with Live Upgrade. So I suggest what ever you
do, make sure you can create a new BE and boot into it before
committing.
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
