Hi Bogdan,
I'd recommend the following RAM minimums for a fair balance of performance.
700Mb 32-bit
1Gb 64-bit
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/l
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Andre Lue wrote:
> Feel free to give EON a twirl. It will only cost you CD and the time to burn
> and boot it. Or if you have a VM you can test it there. You'll know reallly
> fast if it has enough of a framework for you to add the missing bits you need
> or not.
I've been very inactive on opensolaris for a while and have forgotten a
discouraging amount of what little I knew.
I want to get back using the snapshot capability of zfs and am having
a time figuring out how to use zfs list -t snapshot.
man zfs shows:
zfs list [-rH] [-o property[,...]] [-t type
Daniel Carosone wrote:
This sounds like FUD.
There's a comprehensive test suite, and it apparently passes.
It's not exactly FUD. If you search the list archives, you'll find
messages about multiple bugs in the 32-bit code. I strongly suspect that
these have been fixed in the interim, but it
This sounds like FUD.
There's a comprehensive test suite, and it apparently passes.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
There is a 32-bit and 64-bit version of the file system module
available on x86. Given the quality of the development team, I'd be *very*
surprised if such issues as suggested in your message exist.
Jurgen's comment highlights the major issue - the lack of space to
cache data when in 32-bit mode.
Jürgen Keil wrote:
besides performance aspects, what`s the con`s of
running zfs on 32 bit ?
The default 32 bit kernel can cache a limited amount of data
(< 512MB) - unless you lower the "kernelbase" parameter.
In the end the small cache size on 32 bit explains the inferior
performance comp
> besides performance aspects, what`s the con`s of
> running zfs on 32 bit ?
The default 32 bit kernel can cache a limited amount of data
(< 512MB) - unless you lower the "kernelbase" parameter.
In the end the small cache size on 32 bit explains the inferior
performance compared to the 64 bit kern
Js.lists,
My needs are:
* Easy package management
There is no pkgadd or ips included in EON. You can however add IPS and retrieve
any of its available packages.
* Easy upgrades
EON is fairly easy to upgrade and the risk is low. All you have to do is
preserve your previous image before upgrading
Hello,
the ZFS best practices guide at
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide tells:
>* Run ZFS on a system that runs a 64-bit kernel
besides performance aspects, what`s the con`s of running zfs on 32 bit ?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
10 matches
Mail list logo
